Want this question answered?
Some problems with employees with productivity may be quality or an employee not meeting their quotas. To improve productivity, managers can motivate employees through financial rewards.
Productivity is the state or quality of someone to produce. In economics it is the key component of growth.
most of the times yes but price usually depends on the productivity costs not on the quality of the product. A good quality product can be found in low price as and a bad quality product can be branded and expensive.
The advantages of using GDP as a measure of productivity and economic health is that GDP is universal and can be used to measure an economy's growth or decline. The disadvantage of using GDP as a measure of productivity and economic health is that it does not effectively measure the quality of products.
Business companies often measure productivity by the output produced during a specified time period. Efficiency, on the hand, relates to the quality of work in creating output with less waste and using fewer resources.
Some problems with employees with productivity may be quality or an employee not meeting their quotas. To improve productivity, managers can motivate employees through financial rewards.
Quality affect productivity. When quality of a product is damage the demand of product also damage so that people do not buy this product. Bad quality product decrease it personal image.If people do not buy that product automatically productivity also fall.
It depends on whether you are measuring things that are related to quality or not.Figuring out what to measure can be very hard, but when you measure the correct things:Measuring defect removal efficiency; productivity +20%, quality +30%Measurement of bad fix injections; productivity +19%, quality +28%Formal measurement programs; productivity +20%, quality +30%Measurement of requirements changes; productivity +16%, quality +22%EtcNot measuring quality can lead to productivity falling 14% and quality by 19%.If you measure the wrong things quality will NOT improve, i.e. there are organizations that focus on measuring:lines of codehours the developers put inThese are things that are easy to measure but have nothing to do with quality, it does not prevent many organizations from confusing measurement with quality improvement.
Productivity and quality are directly related.When companies yielding high quality products in this way they are saving cost of poor quality.The company has little chances of rework , scrap , and defective products.By efficient use of resources in term of better quality products the company can increase their productivity.
Productivity: the state or quality of producing something
Example: When you have a high quality raw material, you may have a low defect/reject. This may lead you to have high productivity. Productivity = Output / Input. Raw material is an input which can be transformed into a product (output). By the formula of Productivity, high quality of input (use small amount, less defect or reject) may lead to have high output and result on high productivity.
This depends on what kind of software measurement you are talking about. You can use common metrics that have no correlation to software quality and productivity as follows:Measure productivity by the number of hours that developers put inMeasure quality by the number of defects per thousand lines of code (KLOC)In fact, Capers Jones feels that the use of lines of code (LOC) for any metrics should be considered professional malpractice! The above are bad measures and will not lead to much improvement of software quality or productivity.Instead, if you institute measurement that has been proven to be a best-practice then you can get a baseline for your software quality and productivity and then implement improvement processes for both.Examples of proven metrics to improve quality and productivity are:Using function points to measure requirement sizeCalculating quality by defects per function pointUsing cyclomatic complexity to calculate function complexity (productivity +14.5%, quality +19.5%)1Measuring defect removal efficiency (productivity +20.4%, quality +30.4%)1Measurement of bad fix injections (productivity +18.5%, quality +27.5%)1Measurement of requirements changes (productivity +15.7%, quality +21.9%)1You can show that inadequate measurements of quality will reduce productivity by 13.5% and quality by 18.5%11 All numbers above are courtesy of Capers Jones and have been generated by analyzing over 10,000+ projects over 40 years. Contact me for specific details at dmahal@accelerateddevelopment.ca
Productivity management is producing high quality products at an efficient rate, this helps a business by maintaining the same level of quality products at a set efficient rate, so productivity can be calculated and maintained or improved upon.
Omphemetse Matlhape has written: '2007 productivity & quality awareness perceptions in Botswana' -- subject(s): Quality of products, Public opinion, Industrial productivity
It's a fruit that people eat. Explain why you think it should have "productivity" ( which means 'The quality of being productive.' )
Under the Lean Thinking angle of view, Quality and Productivity are the 2 sides of the same medal. They go hand-in-hand. They are allied, not enemies. They are not antithetic.The lean philosophy targets at maximising both Quality and Productivity because it targets at maximising Value: Quality and Productivity are the 2 most essential ingredients of Value.Under the Lean philosophy, improving the one at the expenses of the other would be "handicapped".
Workers tend to differ in their schedule availability and their work quality. It is the HR managers' responsibility to address those different preferences to maximize efficiency and productivity. For example, workers may not be available because of religious holidays, or illness, or family obligations. Then travel, work assignment and other things have to reassessed. Also, workers have different abilities. Some produce better work than others. Then HR has to determine how to properly allocate these individuals. Or, they may have to decide whether they need to hire or fire to maintain or improve the company's productivity.