0
How does a country get a comparative advantage in the production of a good even when it doesn't have have an absolute advantage in the production of that good?
Wiki User
∙ 8y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
If a country has comparative advantage in the production of all goods should it trade?
Yes, since each country can individually specialize in its comparative advantage, the total income for both countries will increase. This is even true if one country has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods.
Difference between absolute cost advantage theory and comparative cost advantage theory?
absolute cost advantage talks about the efficiency and cheaply a country incure in the production of goods and services against other country whiles comparative advantage talks about the opotunity cost of goods
Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
Comparative costs by Adam smith?
The principle of comparative advantage explains how trade can benefit all parties involved (countries, regions, individuals and so on), as long as they produce goods with different relative costs. The net benefits of such an outcome are called gains from trade. Usually attributed to the classical economist David Ricardo, comparative advantage is a key economic concept in the study of trade. Adam Smith had used the principle of absolute advantage to show how a country can benefit from trade if the country has the lowest absolute cost of production in a good (ie. it can produce more output per unit of input than any other country). The principle of comparative advantage shows that what matters is not the absolute cost, but the opportunity cost of production. The opportunity cost of production of a good can be measured as how much production of another good needs to be reduced to increase production by one more unit. The principle of comparative advantage shows that even if a country has no absolute advantage in any product (ie. it is not the most efficient producer for any good), the disadvantaged country can still benefit from specializing in and exporting the product(s) for which it has the lowest opportunity cost of production.[1] [2] It has been argued that it is impossible to falsify the Theory of Comparative Advantage.[3] [4]. The principle of comparative advantageexplains how trade can benefit all parties involved (countries, regions, individuals and so on), as long as they produce goods with different relative costs. The net benefits of such an outcome are called gains from trade. Usually attributed to the classical economist David Ricardo, comparative advantage is a key economic concept in the study of trade. Adam Smith had used the principle of absolute advantage to show how a country can benefit from trade if the country has the lowest absolute cost of production in a good (ie. it can produce more output per unit of input than any other country). The principle of comparative advantage shows that what matters is not the absolute cost, but the opportunity cost of production. The opportunity cost of production of a good can be measured as how much production of another good needs to be reduced to increase production by one more unit. The principle of comparative advantage shows that even if a country has no absolute advantage in any product (ie. it is not the most efficient producer for any good), the disadvantaged country can still benefit from specializing in and exporting the product(s) for which it has the lowest opportunity cost of production.[1] [2] It has been argued that it is impossible to falsify the Theory of Comparative Advantage.[3] [4].
Difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage?
There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.
If a country has comparative advantage in the production of all goods should it trade?
Yes, since each country can individually specialize in its comparative advantage, the total income for both countries will increase. This is even true if one country has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods.
Difference between absolute cost advantage theory and comparative cost advantage theory?
absolute cost advantage talks about the efficiency and cheaply a country incure in the production of goods and services against other country whiles comparative advantage talks about the opotunity cost of goods
Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
Comparative costs by Adam smith?
The principle of comparative advantage explains how trade can benefit all parties involved (countries, regions, individuals and so on), as long as they produce goods with different relative costs. The net benefits of such an outcome are called gains from trade. Usually attributed to the classical economist David Ricardo, comparative advantage is a key economic concept in the study of trade. Adam Smith had used the principle of absolute advantage to show how a country can benefit from trade if the country has the lowest absolute cost of production in a good (ie. it can produce more output per unit of input than any other country). The principle of comparative advantage shows that what matters is not the absolute cost, but the opportunity cost of production. The opportunity cost of production of a good can be measured as how much production of another good needs to be reduced to increase production by one more unit. The principle of comparative advantage shows that even if a country has no absolute advantage in any product (ie. it is not the most efficient producer for any good), the disadvantaged country can still benefit from specializing in and exporting the product(s) for which it has the lowest opportunity cost of production.[1] [2] It has been argued that it is impossible to falsify the Theory of Comparative Advantage.[3] [4]. The principle of comparative advantageexplains how trade can benefit all parties involved (countries, regions, individuals and so on), as long as they produce goods with different relative costs. The net benefits of such an outcome are called gains from trade. Usually attributed to the classical economist David Ricardo, comparative advantage is a key economic concept in the study of trade. Adam Smith had used the principle of absolute advantage to show how a country can benefit from trade if the country has the lowest absolute cost of production in a good (ie. it can produce more output per unit of input than any other country). The principle of comparative advantage shows that what matters is not the absolute cost, but the opportunity cost of production. The opportunity cost of production of a good can be measured as how much production of another good needs to be reduced to increase production by one more unit. The principle of comparative advantage shows that even if a country has no absolute advantage in any product (ie. it is not the most efficient producer for any good), the disadvantaged country can still benefit from specializing in and exporting the product(s) for which it has the lowest opportunity cost of production.[1] [2] It has been argued that it is impossible to falsify the Theory of Comparative Advantage.[3] [4].
What is comparative advantage and absolute advantage?
absolute advantage is when a country,company, indivdual or region can produce a good better and at a cheaper cost than any other competitor.
Difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage?
There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.
Does Egypt have an absolute or comparative advantage?
The question is missing the economic item and, possibly, the point of reference (i.e. the country we are comparing Egypt to). A country will have a comparative or absolute advantage in some thing. In the modern world, though, Egypt is a relatively poor country which means that if it does have an advantage, it is far more likely to be comparative than absolute. However, without a particular item or point of reference, no more details can be given.
When does country x have an absolute advantage over country y the production of corn?
Country x has an absolute advantage when it can produce corn at a lower cost than country y.
When doe one country have a comparative advantage over another country?
When the opportunity cost of its production is lower.
Why does country a have a comparative advantage over country b in the production of televisions?
Country A has a lower opportunity cost for producing televisions
When does Country A have a comparative advantage over Country B in the production of televisions?
Country A has a lower opportunity cost for producing televisions.
In which situation does one country have an absolute advantage over another country?
When its production costs are lower.
