The market model that assumes the least number of firms in an industry is the monopoly model. In a monopoly, a single firm dominates the market, controlling the entire supply of a product or service, which allows it to exert significant pricing power. This structure contrasts sharply with models like perfect competition or oligopoly, which involve multiple firms competing in the market. Consequently, monopolies can lead to less consumer choice and potential market inefficiencies.
AR=MRnormal profits in the long runlarge number of sellersfree entry and excit ,as there are no barriersthe seller is only the price takerperfectly elasticeach firm is a part of the industry
Monopoly is a market structure where single seller sell its goods and service to large number of buyer. Monopoly firms itself industry because in monopoly only one seller are exists in market. Monopolistic market structure reflect the market situation where large no. of buyer and seller are enjoying. The main similarities between monopoly and monopolistic competition are as follow:- . 1) Both market are price maker i.e. price and level of output is decided by firm itself. 2) Large number of buyer are present in the market. 3) Product differentiated on the basis of size, brand, packing feature etc.
This is a rather common question within the Market Structure topic in Economics. In Market Structure, the Perfect Competition (PC) and the monopoly are considered extreme market structures, while other market structures also exist, like the oligolpoly and the monopolistic competition(MC). Before understanding the differences of these 2 market structure. It's important to realize that the PC market structure consists of many firms or sellers in an area or industry. The monopoly on the other hand, consists of a single seller. A good example, would be someone selling things on an island. The differences between the PC and the monopoly market structure are (1) Ease of entry and exit for firms (2) Type of product sold (3) Type of firm (4) Profit in short run and long run. First of all, is (1) ease of entry and exit for firms. For the PC market structure, new firms can easily enter the market structure, as there are no barriers of entry. This means that new firms who knows that there is a profit to be made in some area, location or industry can easily set up a new shop there. For the monopoly, there is substantial or high barriers of entry preventing new firms from entering the market structure. These barriers of entry are created by existing or dominant firms in a monopoly to prevent new firms or competitiors to enter the market structure. The second difference is (2) the type of product sold. For a PC market structure, the product sold is similar. This means that what one seller is selling, is what another seller is selling. Hence products in the PC market structure are perfect substitutes. We also assume that in PC market structure, the consumers have perfect knowledge of the product. This means that the consumers are aware of the price sold in another shop. For the monopoly, the product sold are not perfect substitutes, and can be rather unique. The third difference is the (3) type of firm. Since the PC market structure faces the above 2 characteristics, this means that the firm in this market structure are powerless to influence the price. This means they have no control to increase the price of the product. This is because if they increase the price of the product, and there are perfect competition, firms who increase the price, will lose out to other firms. Hence firms in PC market structure are considered to be Price Takers. Firms in monopoly market structure on the other hand, are Price Makers. This means that they can influence the price of their product sold to consumers. The monopoly is able to do that, as the monopolist is the single seller in a market. The last difference is the (4) existence of profit. For the PC firm, there is a possibility to earn abnormal profit in the short run, but not possible in the long run. This is because, in a PC market structure, when existing firms earn profit, new firms will enter the market structure, shrinking the profit. For the monopoly, there is a possibility to earn abnormal profit in short run and long run, as there is the existence of barriers of entry to prevent new firms to enter the market. Hope this helps. ( although I may have listed the differences here, they are not the only ones, there are others as well, but the rest can be complicated and might need the use of graphs ). (cheong@bgymail.gd.cn)
A monopoly provides the least amount of competition, as it is characterized by a single seller dominating the market with no close substitutes for its product. This lack of competition allows the monopolist to set prices and control supply without concern for rival firms. In contrast, other market structures like perfect competition, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly involve multiple firms, leading to varying degrees of competition.
In pure competition, many firms sell identical products, like in agriculture. A monopoly, such as cable television providers, has a single company dominating the market with no close substitutes. Monopolistic competition, seen in online auctioning, features many firms offering differentiated products. An oligopoly, like the airline industry, consists of a few large firms that dominate the market, often leading to interdependent pricing and strategic behavior among competitors.
http://www.answers.com/library/Investment%20Dictionary-cid-57121 Oligopoly A situation in which a particular market is controlled by a small group of firms.An oligopoly is much like a monopoly, in which only one company exerts control over most of a market. In an oligopoly, there are at least two firms controlling the market.Investopedia Says:The retail gas market is a good example of an oligopoly because a small number of firms control a large majority of the market.
AR=MRnormal profits in the long runlarge number of sellersfree entry and excit ,as there are no barriersthe seller is only the price takerperfectly elasticeach firm is a part of the industry
it is not the company which can be said as monopoly or oligopoly, these both terms refer to two different MARKET structures. therefore the retail industry of UK is said to have similar features as in oligopoly as there are some firms like Tesco, Sainsbury and ASDA which lead the market.
Definition of 'Perfect Competition'A market structure in which the following five criteria are met:1. All firms sell an identical product.2. All firms are price takers.3. All firms have a relatively small market share.4. Buyers know the nature of the product being sold and the pricescharged by each firm.5. The industry is characterized by freedom of entry and exit.Definition of 'Oligopoly'A situation in which a particular market is controlled by a small group of firms.An oligopoly is much like a monopoly, in which only one company exerts control over most of a market. In an oligopoly, there are at least two firms controlling the market.The retail gas market is a good example of an oligopoly because a small number of firms control a large majority of the market.Definition of 'Monopoly'A situation in which a single company or group owns all or nearly all of the marketfor a given type of product or service. By definition, monopoly is characterized by an absence of competition, which often results in high prices and inferior products. According to a strict academic definition, a monopoly is a market containing a single firmDefinition of 'Monopolistic Market'A type of market that features one, if not all, of the traits of a monopoly such as high price levels, supply constraints, or excessive barriers to entry. Because this type of market would be comprised of one supplying firm, consumers would have no choice but to purchase solely from this firm. Without This type of market stands in contrast to a perfectly competitive market.
Monopoly is a market structure where single seller sell its goods and service to large number of buyer. Monopoly firms itself industry because in monopoly only one seller are exists in market. Monopolistic market structure reflect the market situation where large no. of buyer and seller are enjoying. The main similarities between monopoly and monopolistic competition are as follow:- . 1) Both market are price maker i.e. price and level of output is decided by firm itself. 2) Large number of buyer are present in the market. 3) Product differentiated on the basis of size, brand, packing feature etc.
Monopolistic competition versus perfect competition in the long run: The most important difference between monopolistic competition and perfect competition is product differentiation. COMPARISON: Perfect competition: the long run equilibrium where MR=MC=P=AR=AC (at the minimum); Monopolistic competition: the long run equilibrium where MR=MC < P = AC (above the minimum)); This is a rather common question within the Market Structure topic in Economics. In Market Structure, the Perfect Competition (PC) and the monopoly are considered extreme market structures, while other market structures also exist, like the oligopoly and the monopolistic competition(MC). Before understanding the differences of these 2 market structure. It's important to realize that the PC market structure consists of many firms or sellers in an area or industry. The monopoly on the other hand, consists of a single seller. A good example, would be someone selling things on an island. The differences between the PC and the monopoly market structure are (1) Ease of entry and exit for firms (2) Type of product sold (3) Type of firm (4) Profit in short run and long run. First of all, is (1) ease of entry and exit for firms. For the PC market structure, new firms can easily enter the market structure, as there are no barriers of entry. This means that new firms who knows that there is a profit to be made in some area, location or industry can easily set up a new shop there. For the monopoly, there is substantial or high barriers of entry preventing new firms from entering the market structure. These barriers of entry are created by existing or dominant firms in a monopoly to prevent new firms or competitors to enter the market structure. The second difference is (2) the type of product sold. For a PC market structure, the product sold is similar. This means that what one seller is selling, is what another seller is selling. Hence products in the PC market structure are perfect substitutes. We also assume that in PC market structure, the consumers have perfect knowledge of the product. This means that the consumers are aware of the price sold in another shop. For the monopoly, the product sold are not perfect substitutes, and can be rather unique. The third difference is the (3) type of firm. Since the PC market structure faces the above 2 characteristics, this means that the firm in this market structure are powerless to influence the price. This means they have no control to increase the price of the product. This is because if they increase the price of the product, and there are perfect competition, firms who increase the price, will lose out to other firms. Hence firms in PC market structure are considered to be Price Takers. Firms in monopoly market structure on the other hand, are Price Makers. This means that they can influence the price of their product sold to consumers. The monopoly is able to do that, as the monopolist is the single seller in a market. The last difference is the (4) existence of profit. For the PC firm, there is a possibility to earn abnormal profit in the short run, but not possible in the long run. This is because, in a PC market structure, when existing firms earn profit, new firms will enter the market structure, shrinking the profit. For the monopoly, there is a possibility to earn abnormal profit in short run and long run, as there is the existence of barriers of entry to prevent new firms to enter the market.
This is a rather common question within the Market Structure topic in Economics. In Market Structure, the Perfect Competition (PC) and the monopoly are considered extreme market structures, while other market structures also exist, like the oligolpoly and the monopolistic competition(MC). Before understanding the differences of these 2 market structure. It's important to realize that the PC market structure consists of many firms or sellers in an area or industry. The monopoly on the other hand, consists of a single seller. A good example, would be someone selling things on an island. The differences between the PC and the monopoly market structure are (1) Ease of entry and exit for firms (2) Type of product sold (3) Type of firm (4) Profit in short run and long run. First of all, is (1) ease of entry and exit for firms. For the PC market structure, new firms can easily enter the market structure, as there are no barriers of entry. This means that new firms who knows that there is a profit to be made in some area, location or industry can easily set up a new shop there. For the monopoly, there is substantial or high barriers of entry preventing new firms from entering the market structure. These barriers of entry are created by existing or dominant firms in a monopoly to prevent new firms or competitiors to enter the market structure. The second difference is (2) the type of product sold. For a PC market structure, the product sold is similar. This means that what one seller is selling, is what another seller is selling. Hence products in the PC market structure are perfect substitutes. We also assume that in PC market structure, the consumers have perfect knowledge of the product. This means that the consumers are aware of the price sold in another shop. For the monopoly, the product sold are not perfect substitutes, and can be rather unique. The third difference is the (3) type of firm. Since the PC market structure faces the above 2 characteristics, this means that the firm in this market structure are powerless to influence the price. This means they have no control to increase the price of the product. This is because if they increase the price of the product, and there are perfect competition, firms who increase the price, will lose out to other firms. Hence firms in PC market structure are considered to be Price Takers. Firms in monopoly market structure on the other hand, are Price Makers. This means that they can influence the price of their product sold to consumers. The monopoly is able to do that, as the monopolist is the single seller in a market. The last difference is the (4) existence of profit. For the PC firm, there is a possibility to earn abnormal profit in the short run, but not possible in the long run. This is because, in a PC market structure, when existing firms earn profit, new firms will enter the market structure, shrinking the profit. For the monopoly, there is a possibility to earn abnormal profit in short run and long run, as there is the existence of barriers of entry to prevent new firms to enter the market. Hope this helps. ( although I may have listed the differences here, they are not the only ones, there are others as well, but the rest can be complicated and might need the use of graphs ). (cheong@bgymail.gd.cn)
Are you planning to sell your house in a competitive real estate market that can sometimes resemble a game of Monopoly?
the legal Cartel theory suggests that some industries may seek to be regulated or desire that regulation continues, so that the number of firms is limited and the existing firms can act like a monopoly.
Generally, collusion occurs when participating firms can increase their short-run economic profits by controlling supply, acting like a monopoly.
No, monopolists are not price takers like competitive firms. In a competitive market, firms accept the market price as given and cannot influence it due to many competitors. In contrast, a monopolist has market power and can set prices above marginal cost, as they are the sole supplier of a good or service, allowing them to influence the market price.