This is the basic economic problem:
Infinite Wants--> Finite Resources--> Scarcity-->Choice--> Opportunity costs
So the problem is: How can we allocate resources efficiently, knowing that they are an infinite number of wants (but fewer needs) and there are only a limited amount of resources, which are scarce.
Because there is scarcity (deficit/lack of supply of resources), people are left with a choice: That choice is an opportunity cost. Opportunity costs is the cost/disadvantage that occurs from choosing the next-best-alternative because of scarcity.
an example: the government wants to build a new highway, but ther land is scarce( there is not enough land), and so, the opportunity cost is to build a new public school. The opportunity cost is the efficiency and accesibilty of transportation. The next-best-alternative is usually chweaper but is in less quality/quantity than the initial good or service.
So basically, because of scarcity, consuimers and producers have to make a choice: whose wants need to be satisfied? what is more important?
they ensured that limiting their intake and created a balance between need and resources
Scarcity refers to the limited availability of resources, which compels individuals to make choices about how to allocate those resources. When faced with scarcity, individuals must forgo certain options in favor of others, leading to opportunity costs—the value of the next best alternative that is sacrificed. Thus, every decision made in a context of scarcity involves weighing the benefits of one choice against the potential gains of another, highlighting the inherent trade-offs in resource allocation.
Because in an economy, everything is "scarce" (there is a finite amount of that good available), individuals and society can only use these scarce resources to produce a fixed amount of good. Therefore, they have to choose how to use their resources, creating the concept of opportunity costs. Example: You have 100 pieces of wood in the planet You can either create 50 bookshelves or 30 tables. If you choose to produce bookshelves, the opportunity cost is 30 tables (since you don't have any more pieces of wood to produce the tables) and if you choose to produce the tables, the opportunity cost will be 50 bookshelves (for the same reason)
Because in an economy, everything is "scarce" (there is a finite amount of that good available), individuals and society can only use these scarce resources to produce a fixed amount of good. Therefore, they have to choose how to use their resources, creating the concept of opportunity costs.Example:You have 100 pieces of wood in the planetYou can either create 50 bookshelves or 30 tables.If you choose to produce bookshelves, the opportunity cost is 30 tables (since you don't have any more pieces of wood to produce the tables) and if you choose to produce the tables, the opportunity cost will be 50 bookshelves (for the same reason)Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Why_scarcity_forces_individuals_and_society_to_incur_opportunity_costs#ixzz1SVLrG1QA
yes, offcourse, why not, absolutely, definitely, reasonably yes
they ensured that limiting their intake and created a balance between need and resources
Scarcity refers to the limited availability of resources, which compels individuals to make choices about how to allocate those resources. When faced with scarcity, individuals must forgo certain options in favor of others, leading to opportunity costs—the value of the next best alternative that is sacrificed. Thus, every decision made in a context of scarcity involves weighing the benefits of one choice against the potential gains of another, highlighting the inherent trade-offs in resource allocation.
Because in an economy, everything is "scarce" (there is a finite amount of that good available), individuals and society can only use these scarce resources to produce a fixed amount of good. Therefore, they have to choose how to use their resources, creating the concept of opportunity costs. Example: You have 100 pieces of wood in the planet You can either create 50 bookshelves or 30 tables. If you choose to produce bookshelves, the opportunity cost is 30 tables (since you don't have any more pieces of wood to produce the tables) and if you choose to produce the tables, the opportunity cost will be 50 bookshelves (for the same reason)
Because in an economy, everything is "scarce" (there is a finite amount of that good available), individuals and society can only use these scarce resources to produce a fixed amount of good. Therefore, they have to choose how to use their resources, creating the concept of opportunity costs.Example:You have 100 pieces of wood in the planetYou can either create 50 bookshelves or 30 tables.If you choose to produce bookshelves, the opportunity cost is 30 tables (since you don't have any more pieces of wood to produce the tables) and if you choose to produce the tables, the opportunity cost will be 50 bookshelves (for the same reason)Read more: http://wiki.answers.com/Why_scarcity_forces_individuals_and_society_to_incur_opportunity_costs#ixzz1SVLrG1QA
yes, offcourse, why not, absolutely, definitely, reasonably yes
Comparative Advantage.
No. You would only incur more costs.No. You would only incur more costs.No. You would only incur more costs.No. You would only incur more costs.
Opportunity cost does not decrease, it increases, according to the law of increasing opportunity costs. This law states that the more of a product you produce the less efficient production of it will be and the more opportunity cost they will incur.
Drivers who are convicted of speeding incur a penalty.
you will incur additional cost
It is easy to incur debt if you abuse your credit cards.
maybe..... incur is a very hard word to put into a sentence. or' How do you put incur into an sentence hope it helpps! ya byeees