Want this question answered?
use of fewer resources than the economy is capable of using
This situation is called underutilization. It can be both beneficial and harmful to a community. It's a benefit in that it saves some resources, but underutilizing resources can cause them to be produced in smaller numbers, leading to an imbalance as the resources are no longer underutilized because there is no longer a surplus.
This situation is called underutilization. It can be both beneficial and harmful to a community. It's a benefit in that it saves some resources, but underutilizing resources can cause them to be produced in smaller numbers, leading to an imbalance as the resources are no longer underutilized because there is no longer a surplus.
using fewer resources than an economy is capable of using
using fewer resources than the economy is capable of using.
use of fewer resources than the economy is capable of using
This situation is called underutilization. It can be both beneficial and harmful to a community. It's a benefit in that it saves some resources, but underutilizing resources can cause them to be produced in smaller numbers, leading to an imbalance as the resources are no longer underutilized because there is no longer a surplus.
This situation is called underutilization. It can be both beneficial and harmful to a community. It's a benefit in that it saves some resources, but underutilizing resources can cause them to be produced in smaller numbers, leading to an imbalance as the resources are no longer underutilized because there is no longer a surplus.
This situation is called underutilization. It can be both beneficial and harmful to a community. It's a benefit in that it saves some resources, but underutilizing resources can cause them to be produced in smaller numbers, leading to an imbalance as the resources are no longer underutilized because there is no longer a surplus.
there are fewer resources available.
their small population size and nomadic lifestyle. With fewer people, there was less demand for resources and smaller impact on the environment. Additionally, their mobility allowed them to move to different areas as resources became scarce, minimizing overexploitation of local ecosystems.
there are fewer resources available
they had fewer rights
I think it is fewer resources
Fewer landfills
Hunter-gatherers had few possessions because they were nomadic and needed to travel light to keep up with their lifestyle of following food sources. Carrying fewer possessions also made it easier for them to move their camps and settle in new areas when resources became scarce. Additionally, their material needs were minimal as they relied on natural resources for their survival.
using fewer resources than an economy is capable of using