In economics, sand is considered a resource because it is a crucial raw material used in various industries, particularly in construction and manufacturing. It is essential for producing concrete, glass, and asphalt, making it vital for infrastructure development and urbanization. Additionally, sand extraction and processing can create economic opportunities and jobs, further emphasizing its role as a valuable resource in the economy.
Because money does not produce anything. Something is a capital resource because it produces ... it makes consumables or produces services.
Yes, economics can be considered a science.
Because it follows strict systematic and practical methods
In economics, coal is considered a resource because it is a naturally occurring material that can be extracted and utilized to generate energy, which is essential for various industries and activities. Its abundance and energy content make it a valuable input for electricity generation, heating, and industrial processes. Additionally, coal plays a significant role in economic development by providing jobs and contributing to local and national economies. However, its environmental impact and the shift towards cleaner energy sources are also critical considerations in its valuation as a resource.
land resource water human forest
Because money does not produce anything. Something is a capital resource because it produces ... it makes consumables or produces services.
Yes, sand is a natural resource
Danusy
It is renewable!
Yes sand is a renewable resource
Donald E. Campbell has written: 'Incentives' -- subject(s): Mathematical models, Social choice 'Resource allocation mechanisms' -- subject(s): Welfare economics, Equilibrium (Economics), Resource allocation, Economics, Consumption (Economics)
It is a fact that sand is a natural resource.
In the same sense that Oil is a non renewable resource, sand is a non renewable resource as well. There is an awful lot of sand on the Earth to last for centuries, perhaps millenia, however if it was used as much as oil for example, it would eventually run out. This is so because rocks take a long time to reach a 'sand state' in sufficient quantities to be considered a resource so eventually, IF the sand did run out, people would have to wait at least several centuries before there would be enough sand again to be used. There is no renewing in this resource at all, the rock cycle is a closed system, however there are NOT equal quanities of material at each stage of the cycle, therefore making it unrenewable.
Yes, economics can be considered a science.
Because it follows strict systematic and practical methods
In economics, coal is considered a resource because it is a naturally occurring material that can be extracted and utilized to generate energy, which is essential for various industries and activities. Its abundance and energy content make it a valuable input for electricity generation, heating, and industrial processes. Additionally, coal plays a significant role in economic development by providing jobs and contributing to local and national economies. However, its environmental impact and the shift towards cleaner energy sources are also critical considerations in its valuation as a resource.
i have no idear