In the long run, money is generally considered to be neutral, meaning it does not have a significant impact on the overall economy or people's well-being. However, its effects can vary depending on how it is used and distributed.
Monetary policy is not neutral in the short-run but neutral in the long-run. Besides, fiscal policy is not neutral in both short-run and long-run.
true
wages and raw material effect short run aggregate supply because of productivity factor but money is neutral in the long run so will never effect long run
True
Long run, so that long-run economic profits are zero.
Monetary policy is not neutral in the short-run but neutral in the long-run. Besides, fiscal policy is not neutral in both short-run and long-run.
true
wages and raw material effect short run aggregate supply because of productivity factor but money is neutral in the long run so will never effect long run
Untill you run out of money.
In the long run, they can.
True
Long run, so that long-run economic profits are zero.
the answer to this question if on APEX is TRUE for the run on sentence. ~DCR~
in the long run, yes
no. as long as its not plugged into the computer
It toke 30 year to run out of the money so his dad must had to be rich or he spent it wisely.
Both, it doesn't matter who runs it, as long as they run it right and be true to what they say they will do for the country.