consumption
Indirectly. Some of the large meat-production corporations are feeding Bt corn to their livestock, which are then processed into meat products for human consumption. Although it's approved for human consumption, I'm unaware of any company using Bt corn directly in a human food product.
One is the sudy of human ,enviroment while the other is about.production,consumption which verable into wealth
Any crop that can be grown on a commercial scale for human consumption can be grown via subsistence farming.
The difference between consumption and consumption function is that the consumption function is a formula that measures consumer spending.
In reality human meat is fit for human consumption. Pretty much any animal (unless poisonous) Is fit for human consumption, so yes, bull shark is fit too.
No, no human food is fit for animal consumption.
it all depends on the amount that a person consumes, everything is done in moderation
I had to ingest a medication before the procedure.
Meaning the water has been tested and found fit for human consumption.
Plants feeding on it die, and that can intoxicate/starve animals. These animals are the poisonous and not fit for human consumption.
'Victuals' are food fit for human consumption, so it means we had a good meal.
Desalinization is the process of taking seawater and taking out all the salt in it so it's fit for human consumption.
The phrase "Fit To Be Eaten" can be decribed as "edible". Fit for Consumption may be more appropriate. The opposite being "inedible" or "Unfit for Consumption"
Im pretty sure because i have heard of many homeless people eating it cause its cheap.
It's not good for human consumption.
The quality and assurance section in the food production department ensures that the food is fit for human consumption.