answersLogoWhite

0

Comparative advantage. Because a lower opportunity cost(comparative advantage) means a producer use the resource more efficint to produce what people want the most whereas absolute advantage only consider the number of goods or services being produced. Though a producer have a absolute advantage, but he or she may use the resource inefficiently, which will cause a disadvantge in the confront with scarcity.

If we assign jobs according to comparative advantage, all individuals may benefit if the assignments are well specialized or the products are well exchanged. The resoure is limited, so only specialize each individual accroding to comparative advantage could lead to more total production.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Economics

What is an example that illustrates the difference between comparative advantage and absolute advantage in international trade?

An example that illustrates the difference between comparative advantage and absolute advantage in international trade is the scenario where Country A can produce both cars and computers more efficiently than Country B. However, Country A has a comparative advantage in producing cars, while Country B has a comparative advantage in producing computers. This means that even though Country A has an absolute advantage in both products, it is more beneficial for both countries to specialize in the product they can produce most efficiently and trade with each other.


Difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage?

There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.


Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?

Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.


What is the definition of absolute advantage?

Absolute advantage exists when one economic agent can strictly produce more than another agent in a given good or service. This is different from comparative advantage, which occurs when an economic agent can produce for a lower opportunity cost than another agent.


Examples of absolute and comparative advantage?

Absolute advantage: Vietnam can produce 1000 million tons of rice while South Korea can produce 800 million tons of rice => Vietnam has absolute advantage (since it can produce more than Korea) Comparative advantage: Same example: Vietnam and Korea. To produce 1 more tonnes of rice, Vietnam has to give up producing 3 cars. However, to produce 1 more tonnes of rice, South Korea only have to give up producing 1 cars. => There is a lower opportuniy cost for Korea to produce rice. i.e. South Korea has the comparative advantage.

Related Questions

Does Egypt have an absolute or comparative advantage?

The question is missing the economic item and, possibly, the point of reference (i.e. the country we are comparing Egypt to). A country will have a comparative or absolute advantage in some thing. In the modern world, though, Egypt is a relatively poor country which means that if it does have an advantage, it is far more likely to be comparative than absolute. However, without a particular item or point of reference, no more details can be given.


What is an example that illustrates the difference between comparative advantage and absolute advantage in international trade?

An example that illustrates the difference between comparative advantage and absolute advantage in international trade is the scenario where Country A can produce both cars and computers more efficiently than Country B. However, Country A has a comparative advantage in producing cars, while Country B has a comparative advantage in producing computers. This means that even though Country A has an absolute advantage in both products, it is more beneficial for both countries to specialize in the product they can produce most efficiently and trade with each other.


Difference between absolute advantage and comparative advantage?

There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.


What is the term used to describe the ability to produce a specific product more efficiently than any other nation?

Absolute Advantage


Difference between comparative cost advantage and absolute cost advantage?

Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.


What is the definition of absolute advantage?

Absolute advantage exists when one economic agent can strictly produce more than another agent in a given good or service. This is different from comparative advantage, which occurs when an economic agent can produce for a lower opportunity cost than another agent.


Examples of absolute and comparative advantage?

Absolute advantage: Vietnam can produce 1000 million tons of rice while South Korea can produce 800 million tons of rice => Vietnam has absolute advantage (since it can produce more than Korea) Comparative advantage: Same example: Vietnam and Korea. To produce 1 more tonnes of rice, Vietnam has to give up producing 3 cars. However, to produce 1 more tonnes of rice, South Korea only have to give up producing 1 cars. => There is a lower opportuniy cost for Korea to produce rice. i.e. South Korea has the comparative advantage.


How do absolute advantage and comparative advantage have in common?

Firstly absolute advantage is where a firm or producer can produce the good using less/fewer resources than another competitor, therefore the producer has the absolute advantage and is more economically efficent. Whereas Comparative advantage is where a firm can produce a good at a lower opportunity cost than another producer. So these to economic situations are very similar and are both about which producer is most economically efficent to produce certain goods, though they have one main thing in common. Knowing who has the absolute or the comparative advantage means the producers can use specialisation to esure the least resources are produced and the best firms who can produce the good the best are producing them.


What are the concepts of absolute advantage and comparative advantage?

Absolute advantage refers to the ability of a country or individual to produce a good or service more efficiently than others, using fewer resources. In contrast, comparative advantage focuses on the relative opportunity cost of producing goods, meaning that a country should specialize in producing goods for which it has the lowest opportunity cost, even if it doesn't have an absolute advantage. This specialization allows for more efficient production and trade, ultimately benefiting all parties involved. Both concepts are fundamental to international trade and economics.


What is the comparative degree for more important?

"More important" is the comparative degree of important.


Theory of specialization?

comparative advantage theorie and absolute advantage theorie


How does outsourcing relate to the concepts of comparative advantage and efficiency?

How does outsourcing relate to the concepts of comparative advantage and efficiency?Read more: How_does_outsourcing_relate_to_the_concepts_of_comparative_advantage_and_efficiency