They have a fair economical condition, or they have a hard economical condition.
It's missing an adjective for the noun 'economical.'
When "economical" is used as a preposition it is correct to say : They have an economical condition, with the meaning of profitable.
"economical" has no comparative or superlative form. You would say "more economical" or "most economical."
The invention of technology!
thrifty, conservative, cheap, price-sensitive, economical
Benjamin Franklin was the author of 'An Economical Project.'
There are differences in the way economic and economical is used. Economic refers to the economy and finances while economical describes a thrifty person.
That is the correct spelling of the adjective "economic."
Mehr is the money that a Muslim man offers to his bride. No exact amount is binding. It depends on the economical condition of the Man. It may be millions if the Bridegroom can afford. It is not correct to say that it is: Rs: 32.50. It has got no value now a days.
"economical" has no comparative or superlative form. You would say "more economical" or "most economical."
The invention of technology!
As you have stated it, that is not entirely correct. If it was a single sentence then the word "thank" would not be capitalized, and if it is two sentences, then there should be a period after "assessment". You might find it more economical to say "Thank you for the assessment."
stopanstven, ikonomicheski (ikonomichen)
(science) economique.
ventanas economicas
No, the subjunctive is not required because "when" does not introduce a contrary-to-fact condition.
I would say, "Microsofot", McDonalds.
Because Britain can maintain the economical condition and can be more popular and rich
Both are correct, with different meaning. If I wasintroduces a real condition in the past, and if I wereintroduces an unreal condition in the present. For example: If I was hungry I ate and If I were hungry I would eat