In many ways, yes. When you trade, you take something that has actual value to you, and you directly exchange it for something else that has value to you, usually to the mutual benefit of both parties. What you each have is needed or strongly desired by the other. Money is too far removed from the actual object that has value. "Dollars" float through thin air at light-speed, and their meaning is getting lost. The problem with trade is mostly a matter of convenience. I just ate a perfectly ripe pear. If I wanted to get another one by direct trade, how would I do that? There are too many people, and too many things from too far away, to make trade an everyday experience.
This is really like asking whether a broken arm or a broken leg is better. Trade deficits are bad, m'kay? If you have one, you have to borrow money to pay for the things you import (because you get money by selling goods to other countries), your citizens don't have as much work as they could, and another country gets rich at your expense. A trade surplus is bad too. If you have one, the country you have it with might implement protective tariffs to slow down your exports and encourage its countrymen to start factories to make the things you're exporting to them. The ideal situation is balanced trade--importing no more than you export.
you are wierd
If a given country imports a greater amount of products of whatever sort (in terms of the money that it pays for them) than it exports (in terms of the money that it receives for them), then its money supply is diminishing, and it has a trade deficit. If, on the contrary, it exports more than it imports, then its money supply will increase, and it has a trade surplus.
Because the rich people / countries want the poor people / countries to stay poor so they are rich. The poor not having many jobs and obviously money will take the amount they can get for the job. So the Rich companies give little money for the trade because there are so many unemployed thus the littlest of money being better than nothing.
For the Greeks used the money to help there trade to grow because the merchants where exchanging goods for money , to later sell them more expensive than they where.
It save money
OK so there was no money until about a couple thousand years ago there discovered a higher trade, to limit the way they do things and have a better trading service. So money money money
This is really like asking whether a broken arm or a broken leg is better. Trade deficits are bad, m'kay? If you have one, you have to borrow money to pay for the things you import (because you get money by selling goods to other countries), your citizens don't have as much work as they could, and another country gets rich at your expense. A trade surplus is bad too. If you have one, the country you have it with might implement protective tariffs to slow down your exports and encourage its countrymen to start factories to make the things you're exporting to them. The ideal situation is balanced trade--importing no more than you export.
yes they are! they are wey better than fair traders!
you are wierd
No it dose not but the better the condition the more money you will be credited
If a given country imports a greater amount of products of whatever sort (in terms of the money that it pays for them) than it exports (in terms of the money that it receives for them), then its money supply is diminishing, and it has a trade deficit. If, on the contrary, it exports more than it imports, then its money supply will increase, and it has a trade surplus.
Because the rich people / countries want the poor people / countries to stay poor so they are rich. The poor not having many jobs and obviously money will take the amount they can get for the job. So the Rich companies give little money for the trade because there are so many unemployed thus the littlest of money being better than nothing.
No, because the US is better than Honduras
For the Greeks used the money to help there trade to grow because the merchants where exchanging goods for money , to later sell them more expensive than they where.
friends are better than pocket money because a good friend will always be there to comfort you when you have or don't have money and friends will always be there for a lifetime but money just come and go.
Yes, but you'de have to trade something thats as good or better than it (in most cases).