This disagreement stems from differing views on government intervention in the economy. Policy activism requires that the monetary and fiscal policy be used in such a way as to improve the economy. This type of reasoning dates back to Keynes, who believed that the economy sometimes needs government help to avoid stagnation. Policy rules require instead that the government use such things as a constant-growth-rate policy so as to accommodate economic growth, but not to attempt to stimulate it. In other words, the economy is best left to its own devices, and government intervention causes more problems than it solves.
if cars which emit emissions will be liable to pay an environment tax, then a fiscal policy is taking place, ie, it falls under macroeconomics. However, you have to exactly define which government regulations you're talking about... because different regulations give a different situation :)
# Should an economic model describe reality exactly?
I do not know exactly
It is worth exactly 1.5 billon dollars but in the us its probably worth exactly 1,045.65 dollars
"that's exactly correct". Very often "quite" means "almost exactly" but here it means "completely".
No, not exactly, although you would be understood. In conversational English, we disagree "with" something or someone. Or we have a disagreement "about" something. So, "I love my best friend, but I sometimes disagree with her about politics." Or, "Sometimes my best friend and I have a disagreement about politics."
if cars which emit emissions will be liable to pay an environment tax, then a fiscal policy is taking place, ie, it falls under macroeconomics. However, you have to exactly define which government regulations you're talking about... because different regulations give a different situation :)
Usually by disagreements between nations/groups of people. Or agreements with other nations/groups of people who have a disagreement with another group/nation. This isn't exactly how all wars start, but boiled down to the core, disagreement or a differing view is usually it.
Guns weren't discovered, they were invented. The first firearms were invented in the 1300s. There is some disagreement among "experts" as to when exactly, but most believe it was the early 1300s...about 1320.
Many people place great importance on heritage, hence, it becomes worth debating the topic of exactly what heritage one has, and what the implications of that heritage are.
Plants can develop abnormal growths similar to cancer, but it is not exactly the same as cancer in animals. These growths are often caused by genetic mutations or environmental factors. The implications for plant growth and development can vary, as these growths can affect the plant's ability to photosynthesize, reproduce, and overall health.
The writing of Immanuel Kant. Modernism was a societal movement best reflected in literature and art, including music and architecture. There is a lot of disagreement about exactly when it began and with whom, but Kant was unquestionably a modernist.
The best advice may be to talk to an accountant about all the particulars involved with what exactly what you intend to do. There may be serious tax implications and charity lecensing in your state/county/city.
Marcus Garvey was a Jamaican political leader. He was born August 17, 1887 in St. Anne's Jamaica and died on June 10, 1940 at age 52 in London England. He is best known for activism, black nationalism, and pan-Africanism.
Conflict is when a one thing does not agree with another. Violence is the harmful action that could be taken when dealing with conflict.
It is unclear what exactly Mr. Boggis deserved at the end of the story as it would depend on the specific events and actions he took. It is important to consider the context and moral implications of his behavior to determine if he received a suitable outcome.
Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.