answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

This disagreement stems from differing views on government intervention in the economy. Policy activism requires that the monetary and fiscal policy be used in such a way as to improve the economy. This type of reasoning dates back to Keynes, who believed that the economy sometimes needs government help to avoid stagnation. Policy rules require instead that the government use such things as a constant-growth-rate policy so as to accommodate economic growth, but not to attempt to stimulate it. In other words, the economy is best left to its own devices, and government intervention causes more problems than it solves.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: One of the major issues in macroeconomics is disagreement in the debate over policy activism versus policy rules What exactly is that disagreement Any implications?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Is the phrase disagree to grammatically correct?

No, not exactly, although you would be understood. In conversational English, we disagree "with" something or someone. Or we have a disagreement "about" something. So, "I love my best friend, but I sometimes disagree with her about politics." Or, "Sometimes my best friend and I have a disagreement about politics."


Is the effect of government regulations on auto emissions microeconomics or macroeconomics?

if cars which emit emissions will be liable to pay an environment tax, then a fiscal policy is taking place, ie, it falls under macroeconomics. However, you have to exactly define which government regulations you're talking about... because different regulations give a different situation :)


How do wars start between nations?

Usually by disagreements between nations/groups of people. Or agreements with other nations/groups of people who have a disagreement with another group/nation. This isn't exactly how all wars start, but boiled down to the core, disagreement or a differing view is usually it.


Why heritage is debated?

Many people place great importance on heritage, hence, it becomes worth debating the topic of exactly what heritage one has, and what the implications of that heritage are.


When were guns discouvered?

Guns weren't discovered, they were invented. The first firearms were invented in the 1300s. There is some disagreement among "experts" as to when exactly, but most believe it was the early 1300s...about 1320.


How do you sell jewelry proceeds going to needy?

The best advice may be to talk to an accountant about all the particulars involved with what exactly what you intend to do. There may be serious tax implications and charity lecensing in your state/county/city.


What is an example of modernism?

The writing of Immanuel Kant. Modernism was a societal movement best reflected in literature and art, including music and architecture. There is a lot of disagreement about exactly when it began and with whom, but Kant was unquestionably a modernist.


Whom exactly is Marcus Garvey?

Marcus Garvey was a Jamaican political leader. He was born August 17, 1887 in St. Anne's Jamaica and died on June 10, 1940 at age 52 in London England. He is best known for activism, black nationalism, and pan-Africanism.


At the end of the story did mr boggis get what he deserved?

It is unclear what exactly Mr. Boggis deserved at the end of the story as it would depend on the specific events and actions he took. It is important to consider the context and moral implications of his behavior to determine if he received a suitable outcome.


Is violence same as conflict?

Conflict is when a one thing does not agree with another. Violence is the harmful action that could be taken when dealing with conflict.


What were ancient roman laws written on?

Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.Papyrus was the paper of the times, so the Roman laws would be written on it. However if you are referring to the Twelve Tables, there is a disagreement as to exactly what they were written on. Some sources say they were written on ivory tablets and others say they were written on bronze tablets. We don't know for certain because the originals were destroyed when the Gauls sacked Rome and any existing list would be a copy of the original.


Why is there so much disagreement over the Reichstag Fire?

While it is clear that the fire was started by Hitler and Friends, the exact method and details of who exactly was involved is not clear because... 1. It was a fire. All physical evidence was burned. 2. Hitler had many of the people involved killed after the fire to protect the secret.