Since 1980, many farmers have sold or left their farms due to a combination of economic pressures, including rising production costs, fluctuating commodity prices, and increasing competition from larger agribusinesses. Additionally, factors such as the consolidation of farmland, changes in agricultural policies, and challenges related to climate change have made it difficult for small and medium-sized farms to remain profitable. Many younger generations have also opted for off-farm employment opportunities, leading to a decline in the number of family-owned farms. This trend has contributed to a significant shift in the agricultural landscape.
Many farmers sold or left their farms due to a combination of economic pressures, including falling crop prices, rising operating costs, and increasing debt. Additionally, factors such as droughts, poor harvests, and competition from larger agricultural operations made it difficult for smaller farms to remain viable. The lure of better job opportunities in urban areas also contributed to the decline in the farming population.
When farmers products were declined, esp by Europeans. Farmers suffered to sell their stuffs; they couldn't afford their mortgages, and the BAnks took their farms, houses, and Lands.... Many farmers families aLSo met the big problem; men felt ashamed after they lost their jobs, and left their families behind. Children often looking for jobs to help their families as well as women.
Many farmers left their farms and moved to cities due to a combination of economic pressures and social changes. The rise of industrialization and mechanization reduced the demand for agricultural labor, leading to job losses in rural areas. Additionally, the promise of better wages, improved living standards, and more diverse job opportunities in urban settings attracted many to seek a more stable and prosperous life in cities. Environmental factors, such as droughts or crop failures, also played a significant role in pushing farmers away from their lands.
First of all, the pay in factories was much greater than that of farmers at the time. Also, the income was more steady in factories because it did not depend on environmental conditions like the production of crops does. There were also more opportunities in the city for education for their children. Finally, as agriculture became more mechanized, smaller farmers now had to compete with larger farmers who had much faster machines and larger land and could produce more crops on less land in less time.
Farmers harvest produced because if the plant is left it will go to seed and the produced value will be, very much, reduced.
They used the soil and then left
They got lower rates from the railroads than small farmers and they used up the soil and left.
they used up the soil and left
They got lower rates from the railroads than small farmers and they used up the soil and left.
They used the soil and then left
They got lower rates from the railroads than small farmers and they used up the soil and left.
They got lower rates from the railroads than small farmers and they used up the soil and left.
[1] Farmers faced hard times in the Postwar Boom. Family farms found it hard to compete with "big business farms" and many failed.[2] The poor found themselves to be even worse off after the war despite the economic boom that was going on around them.
They got lower rates from the railroads than small farmers did.pe your *they used up the soil and then left.
many peasants left their farms to go to cities because the city carries more people with money that'll maybe be nice and give them some money and it ciuld probably get them somewhere in life .
When two million people left the farm life they went to populated cities. Many farmers stayed behind with their families.
They got lower rates from the railroads than small farmers and they used up the soil and left.