The notion that national economies are relatively self-contained entities is on the rise
because the economies wouldn't be able to stay
Because national economies around the world are interdependent, a recession in one can cause a chain reaction of recessions or contractions in the rest of the world's national economies. This is why the Great Recession in the United States (2008-2010) led to the Euro Crisis (2010-2012, probably further). The converse is also true - a recovery in one economy can bolster and support national economies around the world; this is also happening as the United States and China got their feet back underneath them, the economies of Australia and several European countries also stabilized.
Trends in national economic development reflect changes occurring at the state and local levels and can impact local economic development planning.
This notion that economists pay more attention to the national economies is right and wrong. It's right because many "big guys" for example: Central Bank makes most of the headline regarding national economy creating a illusion that it's all the economist concerns about. In addition, foreign economists will look at a COUNTRY rather than an individual state when assessing that country's economy. However, it's wrong because many economists do work on the state level and help state/province governor make economic decision that will affect that state.
It is the integration of national economies into the international economy through trade, foreign direct investment, capital flows, migration, the spread of technology, and military presence.
because the economies wouldn't be able to stay
controlled economies
The economies of Germany, Japan, and Russia were all marked by high national debt after World War I. Inflation was another major economic issue these economies faced.
When the American League was organized in 1901.
Because national economies around the world are interdependent, a recession in one can cause a chain reaction of recessions or contractions in the rest of the world's national economies. This is why the Great Recession in the United States (2008-2010) led to the Euro Crisis (2010-2012, probably further). The converse is also true - a recovery in one economy can bolster and support national economies around the world; this is also happening as the United States and China got their feet back underneath them, the economies of Australia and several European countries also stabilized.
Trends in national economic development reflect changes occurring at the state and local levels and can impact local economic development planning.
Both entities fall under the same pay scale. There is no difference in pay.
Non-viable national entities typically lack stable governance, a functioning economy, and widespread recognition from the international community. They may also struggle with internal conflicts, separatist movements, and limited resources, making it difficult for them to provide basic services and maintain order within their borders.
Like any commodity export, diamonds can enhance local and national economies by bringing in money in exchange for the commodity.
This notion that economists pay more attention to the national economies is right and wrong. It's right because many "big guys" for example: Central Bank makes most of the headline regarding national economy creating a illusion that it's all the economist concerns about. In addition, foreign economists will look at a COUNTRY rather than an individual state when assessing that country's economy. However, it's wrong because many economists do work on the state level and help state/province governor make economic decision that will affect that state.
Edward A. Hewett has written: 'The economies of Eastern Europe' -- subject(s): Economic policy 'The gross national product of Hungary' -- subject(s): Economic conditions, Foreign exchange, Gross national product, National income
Means development in infrastructure such as road,schools and hospitals in a country.