True, becuase people in the Mesopotamia becuase most of ther time, they farmed and grew crops
If the farmers were provided with irrigation and marketing facilities the income and employment would increase to a much greater extent as irrigation would help in raising the produce and marketing would help in its distribution. In this way GDP gets higher and employment also increases as it will require a lot of labor.
It resulted in a food surplus, which produced more than they needed, resulting in the ability to sell a lot of their crops to others that needed those farmer's produce.
In present days American farmers can recieve subsidues from the Federal Government to make less produce in an effort to increase prices. But in former days and in some other countries farmers suffer when prices drop.
Farmers grow crops to feed themselves and to sell at market so that they have money to purchase things that they need but can not grow or make for themselves. All people (farmers and non farmers) need to eat and therefore everyone actually depends on what farmers produce for us. The trouble is that farmers have to rely on middle men (merchants) to get their food to the people. It is the merchants that are in the position of making money from the trade. Farmers would benefit themselves by coming together as small communities to decide what to grow, to purchase fertiliser and seeds in bulk and to share in the process of selling their produce, trying to cut out some of the middle men. This will increase their income so that they can save some money - this is how some farmers accumulate savings.
It means an increase in the ability to produce more at a quicker rate.
If the farmers were provided with irrigation and marketing facilities the income and employment would increase to a much greater extent as irrigation would help in raising the produce and marketing would help in its distribution. In this way GDP gets higher and employment also increases as it will require a lot of labor.
It resulted in a food surplus, which produced more than they needed, resulting in the ability to sell a lot of their crops to others that needed those farmer's produce.
Absolutely. Without irrigation, they would be able to produce very little.
To promote plant growth so that farmers get more produce to sell.
Farmers use scientific advances such as genetically modified crops, precision farming techniques, and advanced irrigation systems to increase productivity and produce more biomass. By utilizing these tools, they can optimize crop yields, reduce input costs, and minimize environmental impact, ultimately increasing the amount of biomass they are able to produce.
Producers in the southwestern United States must use irrigation most of the time to raise crops, simply because, most of the time, there's insufficient moisture, without irrigation, to raise and produce crops. So the answer to this question is no.
Producers in the southwestern United States must use irrigation most of the time to raise crops, simply because, most of the time, there's insufficient moisture, without irrigation, to raise and produce crops. So the answer to this question is no.
Extensive irrigation is needed in regions with limited rainfall to ensure crops have enough water for growth. It helps farmers mitigate the effects of drought and produce higher yields. Additionally, irrigation can support the cultivation of crops that are not well-suited to the local climate.
The farmers learned to deal with it by: building levees to control the floods and developing irrigation systems in order to produce wheat, barley, sesame, and flax. Your Welcome :) by: I love youxx <3
by giving him fertilizers
Farmers produce. Farmers Produce Farmers Produce
Irrigation is carried out in water scarcity regions to optimize water use efficiency and ensure a consistent water supply for agriculture. By maximizing the effectiveness of irrigation techniques, farmers can produce crops with less water, ultimately helping to alleviate pressure on limited water resources in these regions.