answersLogoWhite

0

An experiment might not support a hypothesis even if the hypothesis is correct because if the conclusion

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What describes a reason for making a prediciton when doigna controlled experiment?

To idicate what specific results will support a hypothesis


Which describes a reason for making a prediction when doing a controlled experiment?

To determine what sort of data table will be most useful APEX;)


When do we reject a hypothesis?

When we've proven that the hypothesis is false !


How can a rejected hypothesis be of value to a scientist?

the reason why a rejected hypothesis can still be of value to a scientist is because that secific hyothesis may not work for your experiment but it could work for a different experiment/theory


Which of the following describes a reason for making a prediction when doing a controlled experiment?

To indicate what specific results will support a hypothesis to anticipate the observations or measurements that will be made apex


Which is more helpful- proving a hypothesis wrong or supporting a hypothesis?

it depend if the hypothesis is good or wrong. depends if the hypothesis is correct. An hypothesis is, in simple terms, a "guess" based on observed data. For this reason, the data to support any hypothesis can be manipulated to prove it either "right" or "wrong". Neither is more helpful. All scientific endeavour should be tested and retested.


How do you write a hypothesis about dry ice experiment?

A hypothesis for an experiment involving dry ice could be: "I predict that placing dry ice in warm water will cause it to rapidly sublimate, creating a cloud of carbon dioxide gas due to the temperature difference between the dry ice and water." This hypothesis clearly states the expected outcome of the experiment and the reason behind it.


What dose it mean if a scientist fails to reject a hypothesis?

It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.


What dose it mean if a scientists fails to reject a hypothesis?

It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.


What dose it mean if a scientist fail to reject a hypothesis?

It means there is no reason why he should reject it, whether because there is no evidence to the contrary or because an experiment set up to test it affirmed that hypothesis.


What is an testable hypothesis?

you can perform an experiment to support it, ur welcome (= no----- a good hypothesis shouldn't include the words: right, wrong, correct, incorrect. the reason is because no hypothesis is right or wrong. it's just an explaination


What is the main reason for conducting a science experiment?

The main reason for conducting a science experiment is to test a hypothesis or answer a specific question through a systematic and controlled approach. It allows scientists to gather empirical evidence and draw objective conclusions about the natural world.