the government may nationalize an industry
1-the industry may be sinking or becoming bankrupt
2-the industry may be exploiting consumers rights an need to be repremanded
===================
A third reason may be that a nations vital self interest requires the nationalization of various industries.
Visitor attractions can be classified into two categories, man-made or natural-made. Man made would include everything from Disneyland to the world's biggest ball of yarn. Natural-made would include everything from beaches to mountains. Attractions are important to the tourism industry because both of these types of attractions are the only factor for tourism. For example, if you're planning a trip to France to see the sights, i.e. the Eiffel Tower, that's part of the tourism industry, whereas if your planning a trip to Paris to visit your relatives, that's not part of the tourism industry. Attractions are what drive the tourism industry and the only reason it exists.
yes
a free market economyCapitalism is a system in which a nation's trade and industry are operated privately for profit by private owners, rather than by the government. Laissez-faire policy is that the government would abstain from interfering in the free market. Adam Smith believed that the combination of the two would result in free trade capitalism.
Two ways the government of a country can regulate business is to enact new laws that influence business and raise or lower taxes.
laissez-faire; hands-off
Government cannot hold two positions at once for one reason. The reason that government cannot not hold two positions at once is so everyone will have a chance at term.
Raising money for the government. Encouraging the growth of American industry.
The two owners decided to dissolve their partnership. For once, the partnership between government and industry was successful.
They are run by two different types of government, and that of South Korea feels threatened by that of the North for that reason.
The Mexican government followed a strategy known as "import substitution", which basically ramped up taxes on imports and provided credits for local industry to develop. It was a successful policy, as it allowed the "Mexican Miracle", when GDP grew in two-digit numbers between 1940 and 1970.
The Mexican government followed a strategy known as "import substitution", which basically ramped up taxes on imports and provided credits for local industry to develop. It was a successful policy, as it allowed the "Mexican Miracle", when GDP grew in two-digit numbers between 1940 and 1970.
By the earliest days of the US Civil War, the Confederate government acted immediately to nationalize almost all of the productive power of existing manufactures. If not actually nationalizing companies, they placed them under government contract. For example the Tredegar Iron Works that produced the CSS Virginia's iron plate protection was under Confederate contract. Two important tools also strengthened the government's hand in the economy. One was the conscription acts which allowed for the exemption of skilled workers, and the imposition of public domain over rail transportation.
make a better comparison of two companies of different sizes in the same industry
Policy 1: The nanny stae approach. The government essentially controls industry with regard to pollution. All operating decisions are run past government staff and the "green-ness" evaluated before the changes are made. Policy 2: The government sets up rules. Industry interprets and applies the rules and can demonstrate compliance if asked or on aperiodic basis
In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.In the republic the two top government officials were the consuls.
The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.The two officials who directed the Roman government during the republic were the two consuls.
I don't think so. Karur Vysya Bank is one of the largest private sector banks in India. It is extremely well managed and a very profitable entity. There are only two reasons why the government would nationalize private banks - one is if the bank is totally mismanaged and the government feels it has to intervene to protect the customers. The second is if the government feels all banks must be nationalized. Neither is the case now. So, in the near future - No. after 15 or 20 years - only time can tell.