The two requirements that must be supported by a Determination and Finding (D&F) to authorize an interagency acquisition under the Economy Act are: (1) that the acquisition is in the best interest of the government, and (2) that the agency receiving the goods or services has the authority to make the purchase and that the acquisition is for a proper purpose. These requirements ensure accountability and justification for the use of interagency resources.
To authorize entry into Low-Rate Initial Production (LRIP), a program must demonstrate that it meets key performance parameters and is ready for limited production. LRIP allows for the production of a small quantity of systems to verify manufacturing processes and operational effectiveness before full-rate production. For systems that do not require low-rate production, procurement can proceed directly to full-rate production, provided all necessary evaluations and approvals are completed. Thus, the decision hinges on the specific requirements and readiness assessments of the system in question.
Electronic Benefit Transfer (EBT) is an electronic system that allows a recipient to authorize transfer of their government benefits from a Federal account to a retailer account to pay for products received.
Monetization means that you authorize the presence of advertisements on your videos, and YouTube charges advertisers for these and shares the fees with you, allowing you to make some money from people viewing your videos.
An organization must plan and authorize the money that it spends, also known as its expenditures. If the employees of an organization simply buy whatever they want to buy, without planning or authorization, then that organization will almost certainly run out of money and go bankrupt. Given unlimited opportunity to spend, most people are likely to spend too much. And even a very wealthy organization has only so much money to spend. So organizations make plans about how much they want to spend, and then to ensure that their employees will not violate those plans, they have only certain responsible people who are in charge of spending, who must give their agreement, in other words their authorization, before people can spend money. If there is more money spent than was planned, that is called overspending. And if money is spent without the authorization that an organization has asked for, then that is unauthorized expenditure. These things are certainly known to happen, and they endanger the finances of any organization in which they happen.
The biggest problem with your proposal is that the US government which is already drowning in debt and struggling to meet its existing financial obligations, does not have the trillions of dolllars that would be needed in order to pay off every American's mortgage, nor would it be feasible to borrow such a large amount even if Congress were to authorize that much of an increase in the legal debt ceiling (which they wouldn't); there is also another very serious problem which is that not all Americans have an unpaid mortgage (either because they have already paid off their mortgage, or because they don't own a home) so what you are proposing would give a huge benefit to some Americans, by paying off their mortgage, and no direct benefit to other Americans who don't have a mortgage, and this would seem to be very unfair; all Americans have equal rights under the law, and should all be treated equally. Huge gifts to some and no gifts to others would not seem to be fair. But there is no way to raise that much money anway. Of course, there are other options. The government could nationalize all housing. In the Soviet Union, the government owned all housing, assigned housing to everyone, and employed everyone, in an all-encompassing socialist state. However, it was also a hugely inefficient state which eventually collapsed. So that is not a very reliable solution either. I do think that we need to start looking for more radical solutions to our economic problems, but paying off everybody's mortgage would not seem to be the way to do it.
at or below the micro purchase threshold from any vendor
FALSE
The word "authorize" as in "to authorize" is a verb because it is an action.
He had to authorize the purchase that was made on his credit card. She had to sign a permission slip to authorize her son to go on the field trip. He refused to authorize the expenditure.
my aunt was act of the play call the killed man
At the below the micro-purchase from any vendor
The Certification Authority is tasked with determining the degree to which a system complies with the assigned IA controls (based on validation results) and then provides the certification determination to the DAA. The DAA then makes a decision on whether to authorize the system for operation.
you have my permission. You have the orders to proceed.
I hereby authorize (name of a specific person), Attorney at Law, to be the Executor of my Will.I hereby authorize (name of a specific person) to withdraw $200 dollars from my bank account.
To approve or authorize.
There is no direct adverb form. The adverb forms of the participial adjectives (authorizedly and authorizingly) do not appear in dictionaries, nor does authorizably.
Proficient.