During the 1800s Egypt was wealthy compared to other African countries, but in comparison to the European powers, Egypt was indeed very poor. It only got worse from there on- Mohammad Ali spent too much money trying to better his country, but instead made it worse of, sending Egypt into more and more debt.
Simple, you just said it. More economically developed country is a more economically developed country.
Economically The adverb economically derives from the adjectives economic and economical.
Protecting economically weak individuals involves implementing social safety nets, such as unemployment benefits, food assistance, and housing support, to provide immediate relief. Additionally, promoting access to quality education and job training programs can empower them with skills for better employment opportunities. Policies that ensure fair wages and labor rights also help to create a more equitable economic environment. Lastly, fostering community support initiatives and financial literacy programs can enhance their ability to manage resources effectively.
"Economically" is the adverbial form of "economic".The Chancellor's plans were economically unsustainable.
One can know if a stock is economically sound if that stock's chart is constantly increasing or rarely dropping. In addition, if the stock is economically sound, then it is recommended by many.
Yes it is
Kerma was wealthy when Egypt was weak, they were able to conquer and expand into southern Egypt. How are the histories of Napata and Meroe tied to Egypt? Napata conquered Egypt at a weak point. Napatan rule restored and preserved many old Egyptian ways.
at the time of ancient Egypt the government was the strongest in the world
The statement "ancient Egypt was strongest when its rulers were strong" highlights the significance of effective leadership in the stability and prosperity of ancient Egypt. When pharaohs demonstrated strong governance, military prowess, and the ability to unify the nation, Egypt thrived economically and culturally. Conversely, periods of weak leadership often led to internal strife, external invasions, and eventual decline. Thus, the strength of the rulers directly influenced the overall power and success of ancient Egypt.
730bc
When the Egyptian pharaoh became weak I believe that what's called a regent took over until he/she recovered. If by weak you meant weak in power, Egypt would have became weak as well
Tutankhamun reversed the religious changes of his father changing worship of Aten back to Amun. He moved the capital back to Thebes. Ancient Egypt was economically weak at this time. There were some battles with Nubia and Mitanni which is now Syria.
because the civil war left egypt weak and poorly defended.
Not if you're in a undeveloped and economically weak country like America
They became weak and powerless
They became weak and powerless
The problems of bhotia tribes are , illiteracy and lack of education, economically weak, land alienation, and social problem.