Most economists believe that the most efficient way to allocate resources in an economy is through a market-based system, where prices are determined by supply and demand forces. This allows resources to flow to where they are most valued and needed, leading to optimal allocation and efficiency.
As with most arguments, this is a complex disagreement. Environmentalists believe that it is a company's duty to preserve the environment. Even though a company might have to pay more, it should opt for using renewable energy, recyclable materials, or more efficient machinery. However, economists believe that trying to minimize one's carbon footprint will be a financial disadvantage. They think that even though "green" techniques will benefit the environment, it will cost the company more, and it will lessen their profits. Thus, as companies try to find the balance between environmentally-friendly and cost-efficient, environmentalists and economists continue to battle it out.
Economists believe that all goods and services are scarce because all the resources used to create them are scarce. It's like a cycle. Land is all the natural resources that create all the goods and services, if this is scarce then there would be no coal or oil to fuel machines that help keep the natural resources going (capital). If there are no machines to work with then the job becomes hard for workers to do, meaning very few people would do such a job (labor). It's all a cycle of limited resources.
Most economists believe that money neutrality, the idea that changes in the money supply do not affect real variables like output and employment in the long run, has a significant impact on the economy.
True
i believe its balance of trade
Most economists believe the future of business cycles will continue to ebb and flow. They believe business cycles will continue to drive the economy.
As with most arguments, this is a complex disagreement. Environmentalists believe that it is a company's duty to preserve the environment. Even though a company might have to pay more, it should opt for using renewable energy, recyclable materials, or more efficient machinery. However, economists believe that trying to minimize one's carbon footprint will be a financial disadvantage. They think that even though "green" techniques will benefit the environment, it will cost the company more, and it will lessen their profits. Thus, as companies try to find the balance between environmentally-friendly and cost-efficient, environmentalists and economists continue to battle it out.
Economists believe that all goods and services are scarce because all the resources used to create them are scarce. It's like a cycle. Land is all the natural resources that create all the goods and services, if this is scarce then there would be no coal or oil to fuel machines that help keep the natural resources going (capital). If there are no machines to work with then the job becomes hard for workers to do, meaning very few people would do such a job (labor). It's all a cycle of limited resources.
As noted above, it is the so-called Keynesian economists who believe that the private sector is inherently unstable.
Most economists believe that money neutrality, the idea that changes in the money supply do not affect real variables like output and employment in the long run, has a significant impact on the economy.
True
i believe its balance of trade
Politics often emerges when individuals or groups have competing interests or goals that need to be addressed through decision-making and governance. Many political scientists believe that politics emerges as a way to manage conflicts and allocate resources within a society.
I believe you can attempt to allocate as much as you want, but if you try to take more physical memory than your machine has then malloc will instead return a null pointer
Some people believe that the market system is the best mechanism for allocating scarce resources because it allows for competition, which can drive efficiency and innovation. They argue that market forces of supply and demand provide a self-regulating mechanism that can efficiently allocate resources based on consumer preferences and willingness to pay. Additionally, proponents of the market system often view it as promoting individual choice and freedom.
Congress
wait for the economy to achieve equilibrium