answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What are the advantages of consequentialism?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Utilitarianism is sometimes considered to be a subset of?

consequentialism


What benefit can one get in performing consequentialism act?

Consequentialism is an attractive ethical approach because it provides clear and practical guidance – at least in situations where outcomes are easy to predict. The theory is also impartial.


What is the definition of consequentalism?

Consequentialism is a moral theory that states the rightness or wrongness of an action depends on its consequences. This means that an action is considered morally right if it leads to good outcomes, regardless of the intentions behind it. Examples of consequentialist ethical theories include utilitarianism and ethical egoism.


Is consequentialism an ethical theory?

Yes, consequentialism is an ethical theory that focuses on the outcomes or consequences of actions. It holds that the moral worth of an action is determined by its consequences rather than the intentions behind it.


What has the author Steven Sverdlik written?

Steven Sverdlik has written: 'Motive and rightness' -- subject(s): Intenties, Consequentialism (Ethics), Consequentialisme


What are two main ideas that define utilitarianism philosophy?

The two elements of Utilitarianism philosophy are happiness and consequentialism. All that is associated with happiness is good. Utilitarianism is based on utility. The concepts of good and evil are weighed between what is good for the individual and what is good for the greater community. In Consequentialism, an act is judged on whether it causes happiness for a greater number of people.


What are the three main subdivisions of consequentialism?

Three main subdivisions of consequentialism are Ethical Egoism- morally right only if the consequences of an action is favorable only to the one performing an action. Utilitarianism- morally right if the consequences of an action is favorable to everyone. Ethical Altruism- morally right if the consequences of an action is favorable to everyone except to the one performing an action.


What kind of actions are proper for people to take?

This is the fundamental question of the study of ETHICSand, as an entire field of inquiry, it is impossible to give a simple answer. There are numerous ethical frameworks such as: deontology, consequentialism, communal consequentialism, individualist, erratic, etc. Each framework may apply in general or to specific circumstances and then each framework may be subject to disagreement between its very proponents.


What are the strengths and weaknesses of consequentialism?

Consequentialism is the belief that the outcomes of actions, the consequences of certain normative properties decide the rightness or wrongness of the action. This is a moral or ethical theory that insists that the outcomes of any given action are what decided the good or badness of those actions. The major problem with such a belief is that it does little to inform the person acting on what is good or bad. In moral or ethical philosophies the greatest good to the greatest amount is generally accepted as the proper standard by which to judge an action. From a hedonist's point of view pleasure is good and pain is bad take that belief and combine it with consequentialism and suddenly skipping work to stay up all night at an orgy makes a whole lot of sense. Consequentialism can lead to many bad ideas. A member of a certain society allows the other members to sacrifice his or her life to the angry gods who have refused rain on the thirsty people. The society as a group murders this willing sacrifice so the gods might be appeased and suddenly it begins to rain and the people are saved. It was a good thing, by the rules of consequentialism, to murder that person and the consequences served the many. An extreme and primitive example, but it illustrates a major weakness in consequentilism.


Explain the differences between the clasics and the moderns referring human nature virtue and ethics?

The classics often emphasized human nature as fixed and rooted in universal truths, while the moderns viewed human nature as more malleable and subject to change. In terms of virtue, the classics focused on developing virtuous character traits through education and practice, whereas the moderns placed greater emphasis on individual autonomy and personal choice in defining virtue. Finally, in ethics, the classics tended to prioritize the common good and virtues such as courage and wisdom, while the moderns tended to prioritize individual rights and ethical principles such as autonomy and justice.


What are the advantages of mxit?

what are the advantages of mxit? what are the advantages of mxit?


What are the advantages of altman z score?

no advantages no advantages