A state directed economy only occurs in poorer countries, who tend to realise that state directing doesn't work once an economy becomes 'developed' look at Russia for an example. A lot of bad press has been around leading to the conclusion that state directed economy leads to corruption and a stagnant growth - in recent years this is true, but without some sort of state intervention, developing economies will never become developed. PROS OF A STATE DIRECTED ECONOMY. - Market Failure 1. Externalities. When Joe Bloggs buys a cigarette he pays for his personal consumption (assume no tax). However, smoking in public may be problematic for people around him as they suffer from decreased health. As such Joe has paid for his enjoyment and not for the costs that other people around him incur in terms of health. The govt has intervened by taxing cigarettes in order to 'internalize' the costs associated with smoking. This form of government intervention increases efficiency 2. Missing markets Some markets are beneficial for the economy but have HIGH startup costs and because of the lack of economies of scale may prove to be unprofitable for the locals. EG Oil and energy. If the government uses its financial clout to create these markets, the products they sell may benefit the economy in many other ways. 3.Free rider problem. For goods such as defence and policing, everyone benefits - but no one pays directly. These goods are non excludable in that if someone pays for state defence, everyone benefits. If left to the private market, these goods will never be produced. The government will undertake these projects
Aye
Pros: state and private ownership maximizes social welfare competition to obtain products Cons: Taxes harmful products being made
Pros A sense of community within the economy Income equality Potential to get things done very quickly Cons Little innovation No competition within the economy Firms will have a hard time competition in the world market The quality of the good are detrimental Inefficient allocation of resources Lack of Freedom Lack of personal gain Generally, there is a lower standard of living when compared to a free market economy
consumerism plays a crucial role in the economy as it stimulates and enhance the better perfomance of our economy as more people demand goods and services more employment created the level of living rises that means better education, better infrastructure,poverty alliviated the GDP increases aswell as the GNP but the effect it has on the environment and society is disastrous
for a stimulus plan to me it means a financial bailout or a type of insurance to keep your economy afloat. It depends on what the stimulus plan is used for to determine the pros and conns like for instance. If the government plans a stimulus plan for wall street will it be for the right reasons and how will you benifit form it if you are under a ressecion..
Aye
there are none
pros: costs the same amount No money exchange when traveling
No, construction is a good career to get into presently based on the economy. You can read about the pros and cons at www.bizbabble.org
Indiana
NONE!!
Pros: state and private ownership maximizes social welfare competition to obtain products Cons: Taxes harmful products being made
PROS: Tax benefits, forced income preservation, protected by state insurance laws, and funds are managed professionally. CONS: Unknown changes in the economy could affect the settlement, funds could be poorly managed, all money isn't available immediately.
What are the pros and cons of independent members in clinical trial committees having volunteers in these positions
somebody just write some fucqing pros and cons on here !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! geez . i just want to do my history homework ): . you guys are all fucqing kunts !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Bubbles taste better
The pros are not having to worry about your kid or feeding the cons their really expensive!