Economists often give conflicting advice to policy makers for two basic reasons: 1) economists may disagree about the validity of alternative positive theories about how the world works and/or 2) economists may have different values and therefore different normative views about what policy should try to accomplish
1. Each economist has his/personal view
2. Policymakers are choosing wrong economists. Actually they are choosing those who fit their agenda. We have 2 major parties and each party select economists who support their policies.
The first contributor has made some valid points. I'd like to elaborate on them to add more information to the answer. One reason economists disagree is that they look at an economic situation differently because they have differnet values. Speaking in economic terms, they may have different normative views about what policy should try to accomplish. As an example to this, they may have different views on whether taxes should be used to redistribute income.
Another reason why economists disagree is that they have different scientific judgements. Economists may disagree about the validity of alternative positive theories about how the world "operates". An example of this, they may differ in their views of the sensitivity of household savings to changes to after tax return to saving.
There are two main reasons that economists disagree when giving opinions to solve economic problems. Here are prime examples: * Economists do not come to the same conclusions when determining the validity of alternative assumptions of how the world's economy operates. With that said, their views of the sensitivity and impact of household savings to the resulting changes in the after tax return to saving; and * Economists work from different values. ( the prime example here is how an economist in the former USSR had different values than one in the United States) The two economists have different views about what policy should try to accomplish. So, they can have a fundamental differences of whether taxes should be raised for the redistribution of income.
Payment made between countries, whether in settlement of a trade debt, as a unilateral transfer of funds, for capital investment, or for some other purpose. The reasons for such payments and the methods of making them and accounting for them are matters of concern to economists and national governments. International debts are settled either from accumulated balances of foreign currency or claims on foreign currency, or by loans from creditor to debtor, or by drawing on the International Monetary Fund, or by movements of gold. How a country balances its international accounts is one of the most important decisions for its balance of payments.
Workers are unemployed when capitalists canβt make a profit from employing them.
Reasons for the rising demand of land are: increase in population. loss of arable land.
what are the three reasons why waste reduction and resource recovery are important
Religion, Land, Drugs, Money, and conflicting opinions are some of the main ones.
A conflict theory perspective would likely point out that policymakers have a vested interest in promoting adoption due to the financial benefits that come with it, such as reduced strain on social welfare systems. They may also highlight how policymakers may use humanitarian reasons as a guise to advance their own interests and maintain power and control within society.
The reasons for checking the professional background and reputation of commercial building contractors is for your own peace of mind. There are far too many conman doing contract work and doing it very poorly.
It does happen with any relationship. Love and hatred can mix due to conflicting reasons.
people went on crusades for many reasons like to please god, to runaway from the law, get more land or help their reputation
There are two main reasons that economists disagree when giving opinions to solve economic problems. Here are prime examples: * Economists do not come to the same conclusions when determining the validity of alternative assumptions of how the world's economy operates. With that said, their views of the sensitivity and impact of household savings to the resulting changes in the after tax return to saving; and * Economists work from different values. ( the prime example here is how an economist in the former USSR had different values than one in the United States) The two economists have different views about what policy should try to accomplish. So, they can have a fundamental differences of whether taxes should be raised for the redistribution of income.
wages, job satisfaction, fringe benefits, mobility, and business reputation.
"Notoriety" refers to the state of being widely known for negative or disreputable reasons. It often implies a reputation for something undesirable or scandalous.
Its not,and if it were here are the reasons... 1 builds reputation 2 in wars people need to invent example Space Race invented the computer
it would make them look silly and give the newspaper a bad reputation.
They're ugly;they have a reputation for being vicious;that reputation is not wholly undeserved.Your mileage may vary, but that's what it boils down to. (Note: "ugly" is a matter of taste, but most people who don't like them do in fact think they're very ugly dogs.)
market failure is a term used in Economics to denote a condition in which free markets are not able to perform under the certain preassumptions made by economists. The main four reasons for market failure are monopoly power,externalities,public good and information failure.