Critics of big business raised concerns that trusts, which were large corporate conglomerates, stifled competition and created monopolies that could manipulate prices and control markets. They feared that such concentration of economic power would lead to unfair business practices, exploitation of workers, and a lack of consumer choice. Additionally, critics argued that trusts undermined democratic principles by allowing a few wealthy individuals to exert significant influence over politics and public policy. Overall, the rise of trusts was seen as a threat to both economic fairness and democratic governance.
The concerns critics have on big business regarding trusts is that to earn more money trusts often tried to get rid of competition and to control production. The wealth and size of trusts such as standard oil made many Americans fear the influence of business leaders over government.
Critics of big business were particularly concerned about trusts because they concentrated economic power in the hands of a few corporations, reducing competition and leading to monopolistic practices. This concentration often resulted in higher prices for consumers, lower wages for workers, and stifled innovation. Additionally, trusts were seen as having undue influence over politics and government, undermining democratic processes and accountability. Overall, the critics feared that trusts threatened the fairness and integrity of the free market system.
Trusts cut prices to drive competitors out of business.
Because banks were being closed down, so the banks did not have the money to give to them, and the fact that if the small business was being run down, then they would not have the money to pay back for the trusts.
Trusts put smaller competitors out of business using unfair tactics. Trusts could unfairly raise prices since they had no competition. Trusts had too much influence on government officials.
The concerns critics have on big business regarding trusts is that to earn more money trusts often tried to get rid of competition and to control production. The wealth and size of trusts such as standard oil made many Americans fear the influence of business leaders over government.
Critics of big business were particularly concerned about trusts because they concentrated economic power in the hands of a few corporations, reducing competition and leading to monopolistic practices. This concentration often resulted in higher prices for consumers, lower wages for workers, and stifled innovation. Additionally, trusts were seen as having undue influence over politics and government, undermining democratic processes and accountability. Overall, the critics feared that trusts threatened the fairness and integrity of the free market system.
Trusts cut prices to drive competitors out of business.
breaking up business trusts and giant monopolies
Robert Liefmann has written: 'Wirtschaftstheorie und wirtschaftsbeschreibung' -- subject(s): Economics 'Cartels, concerns and trusts' -- subject(s): Trusts, Industrial, Cartels, Industrial Trusts 'International cartels, combines and trusts' -- subject(s): Trusts, Industrial, Industrial Trusts 'Inlandskapital, Auslandskapital, Kriegstribute' -- subject(s): Finance, Capital
Wilson
Trusts put smaller competitors out of business using unfair tactics. Trusts could unfairly raise prices since they had no competition. Trusts had too much influence on government officials.
Theodore Roosevelt
President Taft
They argued that trusts were legal outside the United States.
Eliminating business
Because banks were being closed down, so the banks did not have the money to give to them, and the fact that if the small business was being run down, then they would not have the money to pay back for the trusts.