answersLogoWhite

0

Disputing an argument on the basis of the facts involves challenging the validity or truth of the claims made by presenting evidence or data that contradicts those claims. This process relies on objective information rather than personal opinions or beliefs, aiming to clarify misunderstandings or highlight inaccuracies. By focusing on factual discrepancies, one can strengthen their position and promote a more informed discussion. Ultimately, it seeks to uphold a standard of truth and rational discourse.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

2w ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What does it mean to dispute an argument on the basis of the fact?

To dispute an argument on the basis of fact means to challenge the validity of the argument by presenting evidence or data that contradicts the claims being made. This approach focuses on objective information rather than relying solely on opinions or personal beliefs. By using facts as a basis for disputing an argument, one aims to strengthen their position and demonstrate the flaws in the opposing point of view.


What does it mean to dispute a argument on the basis of the reasoning?

Disputing an argument on the basis of reasoning means criticizing or challenging the logic and rationale behind the argument rather than attacking the person making the argument. It involves examining the premises and conclusions to determine if they are logically sound and valid.


What does quarreled mean?

Quarreled means 'argued', 'fought', 'disagreed'. to disagree a small argument


What does 'rational basis' mean?

A decision or argument based on sound reasoned argument which can be proved - logical.


What is the homograph of a noisy fight?

A homograph of a noisy fight would be "row," which can also mean a noisy argument or dispute.


What does nature of the case mean?

This is the argument of a case rather than the hard facts of a case


What does the Latin word agones mean?

The Greek word agones is the plural of agon, meaning a competition, conflict, dispute, argument, athletic competition and so on.


What does you can't argue with ignorance mean?

Generally when people argue, they argue by comparing the facts that they have. The person whose facts are more compelling wins the argument. An ignorant person does not know any facts. A person who argues with no facts argues with emotion or opinion based on nothing that can be checked or verified by the other side. It is not possible to argue against nothing (no facts.) So while a person who has no facts to bolster his argument can continue arguing, it is a fruitless argument; hence, you can't argue with ignorance. The ignorant person may walk away from an argument believing himself or herself to have won -- not because he or she had the better argument based on facts that could be checked by the other side - but because he or she used opinion or feelings to bolster his or her "argument."


Who did Robert Hook famously have an argument with?

Robert Hooke famously had an argument with Isaac Newton over Newton's theory of gravitation. Hooke claimed that Newton's ideas were similar to his own, leading to a dispute between the two scientists.


What does no basis in fact mean?

"No basis in fact" means that a claim, statement, or argument is not supported by evidence, data, or reality. It suggests that there is no factual information or justification to back up the assertion being made.


What does weight of evidence mean in a civil trial?

It means that there is enough evidence to lead a "reasonable person" to believe that there is sufficient evidence to supports the facts that are in in dispute.


What does major argument mean?

A major argument is a central point or claim that forms the basis of an essay, debate, or discussion. It is the primary idea that the author or speaker is trying to convey and typically serves as the main focus of the overall piece.