a horrible type
That would be COMMUNISM.
The two biggest bills in any economy is military and health care, so technically all of them. If you are implying which economic system has government paying the most civil bills that would be Communism.
The definition of a state-run economy would be Communism but there is no definition of providing for its citizens.
They would likely oppose any interference from the government.
This would be capitalism.
it is that the limited government has rules and if the united states doesnt follow them it would mess up the economic.
A constitutional monarch would have a democratic government. The monarch would be head of state but would not govern the country.
That would be COMMUNISM.
The two biggest bills in any economy is military and health care, so technically all of them. If you are implying which economic system has government paying the most civil bills that would be Communism.
The definition of a state-run economy would be Communism but there is no definition of providing for its citizens.
They would likely oppose any interference from the government.
This would be capitalism.
A traditional economic system would have to be a system based on the tradition of a particular region. that would imply that virtually every country has an economic system that is traditional.
No The goal of communism is no government, but to get their you would have to go through socialism where the government holds the power of the market and then over many many many years the government and economic system would cease to exist and the people would live without it
Monarchy is important because without a King or Monarch there would be total CHAOS in the government.
The US and Japan have what I would describe as a mixed economy; this is a free market, with substantial government regulation.
the country's navy uses only imported wood and steel to build its ships