Want this question answered?
This question cannot be answered. In order for this to be answered you will have to give the examples.
The government pays farmers to produce crops and then buys them for distribution to those in need. In this way the government is both a consumer and producer of the same product.
Central banks control the foreign currency reserves that are used for international trade.They also set each country's monetary policies.
No one is really in charge, so it's insecure and uncertain.
Adam Smith didn't condemn government regulation. That's a myth often promoted vociferously by the right and believed by everyone else because they haven't read Smith. Corporate libertarians promote the myth, too, resting in large part on neoclassical economics, whose adherents took from Smith the property rights portions of The Wealth of Nations that appealed to them and dumped the rest, just as Karl Marx did with labor at the cost of property rights.Yes, Smith proposed that an "invisible hand" of the market would more efficiently guide the marketplace. But he knew there's no efficiency and benefit in a land of anarchy and bandits. Smith read Rousseau and appeared to accept elements of The Social Contract. He also witnessed the rapacious conduct of the British East India Company and was well aware of divisions created by wealth and social class.Sometimes, he suggested, regulation creates a playing field upon which the market can operate most efficiently; e.g., The Wealth of Nations devotes roughly 100 pages to banking regulation.Smith certainly never advocated that government should never intervene in the economy. I'm not at all sure he couldn't have found some common ground with Keynes.
This question cannot be answered. In order for this to be answered you will have to give the examples.
Those who favor supply side policies are supporting that the government plays a reduced role in the economy. They are not supporting a government that has a role in the stock exchange.
I saw Brid,tree,home,poeple playing i meant not home but other
The government pays farmers to produce crops and then buys them for distribution to those in need. In this way the government is both a consumer and producer of the same product.
what teams are playing, weather, the economy
A farting banana farting while playing minecraft
what teams are playing, weather, the economy
Economists and political scientists frequently assess how strong or weak a government should be in terms of playing a role in any nation's economy. Views on this subject differ vastly and governments alter their participation in economic affairs and regulations based on the condition an economy may find itself. In western style democracies, there is a consensus that a government should not play a major role in an economy, unless there is a dire need to do so, such as in a major recession. On an ongoing basis most nations' central banking systems do regulate or influence interest rates and the overall money supply. Also, in any nation or economic situation, experts and government leaders quite often have different views on this topic.In certain nations such as the Peoples Republic of China, the leading members of the Communist Party make economic decisions.
Because the government is a dictatorship.
A diamond - from playing cards.
In "The Ransom of Red Chief," direct characterization is when the narrator directly describes characters' traits, like the main characters, Bill and Sam. Indirect characterization is shown through the actions and dialogue of the characters, such as Red Chief's mischievous behavior and his love for playing pranks.
playing