For the record, it isn't a show of "fiscal restraint" to cut funding for poor kids, especially when that funding goes toward one of the few programs that devotes itself to the children of the least well-off. Head Start is not without its problems, yes, but of the policy interventions we can make into the lives of children, early-childhood education is one of the most worthwhile. Budget cuts might save a few dollars in the short term, but they would come at significant long-term cost for the country at large.
Relatedly, this entire discussion over Head Start demonstrates the lopsidedness of the conversation over spending and taxes:
The fight over federal spending intensified on Capitol Hill this week when two bills - the House Republican version with large cuts to Head Start and scores of other programs, and a Democratic rejoinder with far fewer trims - both failed in the Senate.
As the two sides begin to bargain in earnest, it is increasingly clear that Democrats will be forced to justify the effectiveness and importance of a host of social programs singled out for cuts, while Republicans will have to grapple with the popularity of many of those programs among their constituents, and, as the case with Ms. Murkowski, in their own hearts.
In a rational world -- where we acknowledged our historically low tax rates and massive tax expenditures -- The New York Times would present the opposite formulation, "It is increasingly clear that Republicans will be forced to justify the effectiveness and importance of tax cuts and low rates on investment income." Tax cuts on the rich are far more expensive and far less justifiable than spending on the least well-off, even when that spending goes toward programs of varying effectiveness.
It's a testament to the influence of money on the political process that liberals must justify programs to help poor children, while Republicans can recklessly oppose any efforts to raise revenue, with little in the way of media scrutiny.
Fiscal consolidation is a policy aiming at reducing fiscal deficit of government .
Fiscal policies deal with finances usually budgets.
features of fiscal
Fiscal assets are the capital revenue for the formulated budget.
What are fiscal, monetary, and regulatory policies
Fiscal usually relates to matters of financial stature. Fiscal could also relate to taxes and government issues. The use of the word fiscal can be combined in conjunction with fiscal cliff, fiscal year, fiscal deficit, fiscal policy and fiscal parish.
Restraint, as in you have restraint in the way you approach a difficulty, is an abstract noun. A restraint, as in an object that restrains someone, is a common noun.
A social conservative focuses on preserving traditional values and moral principles in society, especially in areas like family, religion, and culture. On the other hand, a fiscal conservative is more concerned with advocating for limited government intervention in the economy, emphasizing lower taxes, reduced government spending, and a balanced budget.
I guess it shows that i do have some self-restraint if nothing else.
What is fiscal duty?
fiscal
Prior Restraint was created in 1990.
The maening of restraint is hold in
Passive restraint refers to restraint devices that dont require any action on your part. Hence, Airbags. This is the only type of passive restraint I know about, but there may be others.
Fiscal consolidation is a policy aiming at reducing fiscal deficit of government .
The difference between fiscal & non-fiscal metering is when the measurement value is relevance to money.
Manual restraint - having someone hold the animal Mechanical restraint - use of a chute or head gate, mostly for large animals Chemical restraint - use of sedatives/tranquilizers Behavioral restraint - use of previous training