In a healthy economy we see a growth of the GDP.
The global GDP growth rate in real terms for 2008 is 3.2%. See related link for detailed breakdown.
Economists use real GDP per capita rather than simply real GDP. This is because population growth is an important variable (per capita), and so, real GDP per capita is the more accurate measurement of the GDP.
because it helps to see where the economy is heading
Primarily this happens because of increase in prices. Nominal GDP= GDP using current prices. Real GDP= GDP that takes prices changes into account. Let me give a very simple example, let's say: In year 1, the country produced 10 computers for 10 dollars each. So GDP for year 1= $100 In year 2, the country only produced 9 computers for 15 dollars each. So GDP for year 2 = $135 (9x15) In year 2,the nominal GDP has increased from $100 to $135. However, we measure real GDP using a base year, in this case year 1, so we use the price of year 1 to find the real GDP for year 2. Using prices of year 1 we have: 9 computers x $10 each = $90 of real GDP. Finally, you see that even nominal GDP for year 2 was $135, the real GDP was $90.
There is no direct relationship between GDP and area. GDP measures the economic output of a country, while area simply refers to the physical size of the land. Countries with different sizes can have similar or vastly different GDPs depending on various factors such as population, resources, and economic development.
The problem is not population itself; the issue Mexico faces is that economy is not growing as quickly as its population, resulting in poverty and lack of opportunities. As more people are born, they require more health services, education and infrastructure, but if the economy does not grow accordingly, fewer resources have to be distributed among more people, resulting in the problems described above. For example, Mexico's GDP had an annual growth of 1.4% between 1980 and 1990: 1980 GDP: US$194.36 billion 1990 GDP: US$222.98 billion While at the same time, it registered a population growth of more than 2.15% every year: 1980 population: 66.84 million 1990 population: 81.24 million If you divide Mexico's economic output between its population, yo have the GDP per capita, which is a simple way to see a country's wealth: 1980 GDP per capita: US$2,908 1990 GDP per capita: US$2,744 This means between 1980 and 1990, Mexican people on average became poorer.
In a healthy economy we see a growth of the GDP.
They both are increasing.
Advantages: you can see an exact number. Disadvantages: you cannot see the changes between intervals.
See related questions and links
Please see attached links.
They both have a core and they both have an outside shell.
The global GDP growth rate in real terms for 2008 is 3.2%. See related link for detailed breakdown.
Nothing. I see no relationship between the two.
its has a realtionship because you can see light and eye sight can be attracted to it.
the relationship between cad and cam is that one is called cad and the other is called cam ...... can't u see they both end differently