0
It peacefully rips off the material base for further generation's survival for present generations' present interest. Regardless that is done by cooperative or competitive economic developments. Resources are intrinsically limited and the process of resources consumption is irreversible. But human survival and development inevitably depend on it.
What else can I help you with?
How does economic impact affect business?
You spelled bisiness wrong, its business.
Which goal of the US economy is concerned with questions of fairness and right and wrong?
Economic Equity
Should rights be a characteristic of an economic system?
Yes, at least basic honesty. Profiting by deciet and misreprpresentation is wrong.
Why is a strictly economic definition of development inadequate?
According to the book Economic Development (Todaro & Smith, 2006), the strictly economic view of development has been to generate and sustain increase in GNI at a rate of 5% or more. I believe that this strictly economic definition of development is flawed because of what it is, strictly economical. That is, because it presents a very narrow view of development from only an economic viewpoint, which misses many different aspects of growth. The missed parts would include many economically immeasurable quantities, such as the quality of education imparted or whether some cultural or social position attends to an individual's self-esteem. Another economic way to measure growth would be to look at the per capita GDP increase verses the growth rate of its population. As is the problem with the earlier GNI approach, it does not encompass the problem entirely, but only looks at growth from a strictly economic point of view. Another problem one faces when we look at a country as a whole is that we tend to categorize together different factions and groups as one, that is, the rural population with the urban population, (where in Pakistan or India's case, is a huge contrast, even in economic terms). Similarly looking at economic incomes of one province that is fertile with another province that is nothing but a desert (and would not be able to sustain as much agriculture) and expecting it to have similar incomes is again wrong. To me, economical development means something else; it is not just about economics, it is all that, but also about raising an individual's level of happiness, about easing a person's unnecessary burdens such as illnesses like polio or having to walk ten miles just to get fresh water. These are things which I believe would not show up on a marker developed using the strictly economic development definition. Eventually all this might lead to economic growth, economic gain and economic growth, but I do not believe that it should be the target, rather an effect. The past decade has presented us with many examples of the fact; that economic development does not necessarily mean that there will be real development. Still there are examples that do break the mould, while it also does seem implicitly apparent that, given a high enough and sustainable amount of economic development, real development might eventually follow, if governed and managed properly. Examples of countries that have had growth by the economic development would be; Pakistan, which has had growth rates at around 7% for a few years, whereas India has had a growth rate of about 9.4% for the 2006-2007 year. Still these countries are greatly underdeveloped and suffer from a lack of education and many other ailments, one reason might be only the development of certain sectors of the economy and the lack of effective allocation of resources by the government. Similarly, in smaller countries, Ethiopia actually has a growth rate of 11%, but is marred with many problems such as health and hunger, with many problems and features which are distinctive of an underdeveloped country including a high reliance on agriculture. According to the human development index, these countries rank in either the middle or lower parts of the HDI (134, 126, and 170 respectively), they also rank low in GDP per capital(170,154,and 211 respectively). As Economic growth is purely economical, using it as an indicator or well being or a marker for standard of living would be an improper usage. I believe that economic growth would overlook distribution of income, as it would not look at equity or equal distribution of the benefits, but rather count the entire country as a whole. Secondly also believe that economic development, not paralleled with real growth and real development might actually be detrimental to the economy, it might cause people to develop artificial needs which the economy, a developing economy might not be able to provide. Development seems to have two parts to it, not only economical development, which is, monetary growth and the growth of systems to support that but also a positive and progressive change in many different sectors of society such that the people benefit. For example, health, education, population decrease, equality of different groups, etc. I believe that development is the sustainable improvement in the quality of life without bias while at the same time improving the capabilities of the system to handle such growth at a maintainable level and for a longer term, and provide such benefits to its people.
How do factors such as climate mineral resources and rainfall have an impact on development?
These things seldom have any positive or negative effects on development Wrong. The correct Gradpoint/Novanet answer is Poor climate, rainfall, and a lack of mineral resources complicate development. ~Chris
What are the economic reasons that justify the development of the EU?
because some things are going too wrong with it
Is Lebanon peaceful?
Yes, Lebanon is a very peaceful country, the media shows the opposite though, which is completely wrong.
Is a opinion right?
I don't think an opinion can be right or wrong. Its just your expressed feelings about a situation. "I think the sky looks peaceful tonight." It doesnt matter whether or no the sky is peaceful. The person thinks the sky is peaceful. So their opinion isn't right or wrong. It certaintly isn't wrong to have an opinion, it shows a well rounded person.
Moral development is development of?
A sense of what is right and wrong :)
How do you be peaceful?
I think to be peaceful you just have to hold your tongue. Many acts of hatred, anger, hostility and others have come from someone saying the wrong thing or in the wrong tone. When someone says something that rubs you the wrong way aproach them later when you are not flustered on the subject. That way you will have a clear state of mind and can avoid starting an arguement.
Deciding what is right and wrong is a dimension of what development?
moral
How does economic impact affect business?
You spelled bisiness wrong, its business.
What has the author Anthony J Carter written?
Anthony J. Carter has written: 'Wrong diagnosis, wrong remedies' -- subject(s): Economic policy, European Economic Community, Free enterprise 'Hesed'
What are the two offices underneath the Jurisdiction of the executive office?
National Security Council Office of Policy Development Office of Management and Budget Council of Economic Advisors White House Office
What was a focus of both Booker t Washington and w.e.b du bois for people in the African dispora?
economic improvement :) apex
Why did Thomas Jefferson oppose the Revolutionary War?
Probably because he is mostly a peaceful guy then a war guy,but still he believes in what is right and what is wrong.
What did the northern states develop an economic base on?
plantations plantations ^wrong industries -jackie
