Serfs were slaves and not a different group of people ( serf is Latin for slave). In the middle ages there was no emancipation for these people.
Serfs excepted their economic hardships because they needed the food, shelter, and protection that their lords offered.
Population fell, trade declined, serfs left their manors in search of better pay
In the economic system of manorialism, a manor was a self-sufficient estate owned by a lord, which included agricultural land, peasant villages, and a manor house. It served as the basic unit of feudal society, where peasants or serfs worked the land in exchange for protection and a place to live. The lord received taxes and labor from the peasants, while the peasants gained access to resources needed for their survival. This system created a localized economy based on agriculture and mutual obligations.
A large farming estate where nobles and serfs lived and worked is called a "manor." Manors were central to the feudal system in medieval Europe, with the lord of the manor overseeing the estate and the serfs providing labor in exchange for protection and land use. The manor typically included agricultural fields, a manor house, and various buildings for livestock and storage. This system structured rural life and economy during that period.
In the European feudal system under manorialism, the most significant economic commodity was land. Land was the primary source of wealth and power, as it provided the means for agricultural production, which was essential for sustenance and trade. Peasants, or serfs, worked the land in exchange for protection and a place to live, making their labor crucial to the economy. Thus, landownership and agricultural output were central to the feudal economy.
the emancipation of russia serfs
Serfs were barely above slaves themselves. I doubt any serfs ever owned slaves.
The Emancipation Edict was a negative detriment to the life of serfs. With a major reduction in the work force, conditions for the serf who was in a voluntary lengthy contract became much harder.
set serfs free and gave them land
Roxanne Easley has written: 'The emancipation of the serfs in Russia' -- subject(s): Emancipation, Arbitrators, Serfs, Civil society
They ruled the serfs/slaves ( serfs are slaves) and they lived well instead of in a dirt floor hut.
Slaves
In historical contexts, serfs are not considered slaves. Serfs were tied to the land they worked on and owed labor and other obligations to their lord, but they were not considered property like slaves.
Serfs were slaves who were owned by nobles.
Serfs were slaves who were owned by nobles.
how is aztec society orginized
slaves