Want this question answered?
Economics is not political science. However, the fields can have some overlap like political economy. Lastly, economics and political science are both a social science.
read the book and you will know silly i can't STAND these questions, GTFO!
The economic issues that gave rise to the Populist Party were founded the economic depression. The political and economic changes that the party advocated for included better roads and ease of trading their agricultural products.
microeconomicsThere is no branch of economics that deals with the political process (of government). Similarly it seems that politicians have little or no direct understanding of economics even though they do participate in its national management.Economic Perspective:This isn't entirely true. 'Political Economics' is an attempt to take economic concepts and apply them to politics in order to explain various observed phenomenon (the pervasiveness of political corruption, regulatory agency acted to protect the regulated, etc.). Whether this can be rightly called a 'branch of economics' is unlikely. In regards to the opinion immediately following this, 'Political Science' has never been 'economics' (although it was referred to as 'political economy' in its infancy). Likewise, the assertion that economics necessarily deals with mathematics and quantifying the 'unmeasurable' is a pervasive myth. Economics is a way of thinking--an examination of incentives, trade offs, and allocation of resources. As such, it provides much of the structure behind pseudo-political theories like 'Public Choice Theory' and the 'Capture Theory of Regulation'.Political Science Perspective:Before we had the general term "economics" as the name of the subject it was called "Political Science". This was intended to serve the subject of how people are organized in society when they work and produce and distribute their produce with the help of money. However the term "Political Economics" as mentioned above, is far from being as exact as the "science" part of "political science" implies. I fail to see how the name "Political Economics" applies even to the political phenemona which have doubtful meaning except on a specific politician's aspect. Are we really concerned as scientists on the amout of (unmeasurable) corruption that goes on in these circles?
Yes, anthropology, economics, political science, psychology, and sociology are all appropriately classified as social sciences.
There are a few populist that is similar to political platforms. The main populist would be farmers.
Populist means a member of a political party that represents in the interests of 'ordinary' people. A populist may help the 'common people' get their point across in the House of Commons or another political speaking post.
the amacnal
The populists which where formed in 1891.
Economics is not political science. However, the fields can have some overlap like political economy. Lastly, economics and political science are both a social science.
the populist party
Answer is :populist,===============================================================the answer is populists
The Populist Party
The Populist Party.
i think its the populist party
nothing
Political economy.