Some reasons could be:
* Availability of nuclear fuel * Availability of nuclear technology * Declining reserves of fossil fuels * Power generation Potential of nuclear fuels
I assume you mean how does nuclear radiation affect the human body. Nuclear energy as used in nuclear power plants has no effect normally as the radiation is well contained. However if you want to know about the effect of radiation on the body, see the link below
He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.He was the Prime Minister and naturally would want to make things better for the people. As part of that he would have wanted to improve the economy which had weakened compared to what it was at one time.
If you have a monopoly, why would you want an oligopoly? You make more profit alone.
You would want to make the decision that will lead to the best consequences, obviously.
It all depends on what it is, how good it is, how helpful it is and how many people would want it.
Governments want scientists to work on a nuclear power plant to lessen the dependence of fossil fuels. The product of nuclear power plants are atomic energy, a clean energy alternative.
as it still has energy in it.
SONE stands for Supporters Of Nuclear Energy. They are an organization that want to promote nuclear energy as not only an acceptable means of energy production, but a necessary one in order to face the future energy demands of the world. They feel nuclear energy would help developed countries to keep a sustainable economy.
Heat is the obvious choice for controlled use of nuclear energy. In a weapon you also want a blast effect to destroy buildings etc.
Yes, nuclear energy is considered active energy because it involves the controlled release of energy from nuclear reactions to produce electricity. It relies on the process of nuclear fission or fusion to generate power.
Because China want to build nuclear reactors to generate electric energy.
Its not the nuclear energy, per se, that is harmful, it is the ionizing radiation that comes from the nuclear energy that is harmful. Also, its not the pregnant woman that's the issue, its the developing fetus that's the issue. Ionizing radiation is extremely harmful to developing fetal tissue, because any errors introduced at this stage have a very risk risk of compromising the viability of the fetus. Last, and lets be crystal clear on this point... nuclear energy itself is harmful to no one. Its the "generation of nuclear energy", i.e. the reactor itself, the power plant itself, that is the issue, if, in any way possible, there is an issue. You would not want a pregnant woman working as a radiation worker any more than you would want to give a pregnant woman an x-ray.
The new country that want to make nuclear weapons. And how to consult with they own weapons
Nobody- you cannot win a nuclear war. You may want to watch the film 'Threads' on YouTube for a good simulation of what a Nuclear war would do.
Countries want them, countries make the laws.
From what I understand the issue is not really the access to nuclear energy but, the access to nuclear material. If some more "rogue" and "dangerous" countries had access to nuclear material and enriching plants they could easily create nuclear bombs which, these countries being more unstable than most, they could use for an attack that would kill many people.
I assume you want to convert it into useful energy. Nuclear energy will produce heat; this is usually used to heat pressurized water; the pressure escapes as steam. It escapes with force, and can move machinery - usually a generator that produces electricity.