Flexibility
flexibility
sayings of a given culture, e.g. - "you can't fight city hall".
Laissez-faire is a general concept that suggests that government should stay out of the regulation business. In short, Government should have NOTHING to do with childcare, especially when it comes to funding of childcare or the creation of childcare agencies.
Generally, a communist country is characterized by an economy in which the owners of businesses do not own their means of production. In a communist society it is a general practice for the government to regulate businesses and the amount of money that people make.
A firm generally thought of as one company. An industry is a generalization for the type of business in which a company engages. For example, General Motors is a company that builds cars. Automobile manufacturing is the industry.
Because LEDCs are generally weaker than MEDCS so in a general term we are to see the weak rise compared to the strong, cause you cannot get stronger.
seek moderation and avoid excess
The only real difference in general usage is that "about to" suggests something is to be done very soon, and "going to" suggests something is to be done, but not necessarily right away.
genre
genre
general standards field work of standards reporting standards
This seems like a personal question. To make it more general, id generally say that most wouldn't convert solely on the fact something is mainstream, unless its significantly pressured as philosophy suggests.
General principle of insurance is that you can't insure something in which you don't have an interest.
This is generally referred to as pollution.
An example is a particular instance that serves to illustrate a general rule, principle, or concept. It is used to provide a clear demonstration or representation of something.
Canon means the same in sports as it means anywhere else. A canon is a general law, rule, principle, or criterion by which something is judged.
Customary, as is generally accepted or done.
Why shouldn't it be obeyed in iorganic chemistry, as stated in your question. It is quite general for reactions with intermediates and does not exclude inorganic substances. However, the Hammond's principle is now generally considered obsolete. So, why bother anyhow? (The principle was generally accepted until the 1970s when too many exceptions started to appear.)