Study Island answer - France.
I'd say take out your notes, but I don't have em' either so :D
Lumber for one... wheat. There are many. Simply think of what products or services Canada has a low-cost for. In other words, if the product has a low opportunity cost to another product, then chances are that country will export or "produce" in comparative advantage.
There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.
Yes, since each country can individually specialize in its comparative advantage, the total income for both countries will increase. This is even true if one country has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods.
absolute cost advantage talks about the efficiency and cheaply a country incure in the production of goods and services against other country whiles comparative advantage talks about the opotunity cost of goods
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
Lumber for one... wheat. There are many. Simply think of what products or services Canada has a low-cost for. In other words, if the product has a low opportunity cost to another product, then chances are that country will export or "produce" in comparative advantage.
There are many similarities and differences between Comparative Advantage and Absolute Advantage. Some simple differences between the two would be, comparative advantage uses the driving force of specialization. Another thing of comparative are, if one country has an absolute advantage or disadvantage in any kind of output, any of the other countries will maybe profit from majoring in and distributing those products. Absolute advantage has a country that economically has a benefit over another, in a precise moral, when it produces that moral at a lower cost. Also a country using the same contribution of properties a country with an absolute advantage will have superior productivity. A few modest similarities between comparative and absolute advantage are, both of these terms are two basic concepts to international trade. Additional details would be the two terms both produce a product more efficiently which gives them an absolute advantage.
Yes, since each country can individually specialize in its comparative advantage, the total income for both countries will increase. This is even true if one country has an absolute advantage in the production of all goods.
comparative advantage :)
a country that makes the good it produuces
absolute cost advantage talks about the efficiency and cheaply a country incure in the production of goods and services against other country whiles comparative advantage talks about the opotunity cost of goods
A country has comparative advantage if it can produce a good for less cost than any other nation. (study island)A comparative advantage is the condition that exists when someone can produce a good or service at a lower opportunity cost than someone else.
Absolute advantage and comparative advantage are two basic concepts to international trade. Under absolute advantage, one country can produce more output per unit of productive input than another. With comparative advantage, if one country has an absolute (dis)advantage in every type of output, the other might benefit from specializing in and exporting those products, if any exist.A country has an absolute advantage economically over another, in a particular good, when it can produce that good at a lower cost. Using the same input of resources a country with an absolute advantage will have greater output. Assuming this one good is the only item in the market, beneficial trade is impossible. An absolute advantage is one where trade is not mutually beneficial, as opposed to a comparative advantage where trade is mutually beneficial.A country has a comparative advantage in the production of a good if it can produce that good at a lower opportunity cost relative to another country. The theory of comparative advantage explains why it can be beneficial for two parties (countries, regions, individuals and so on) to trade if one has a lower relative cost of producing some good. What matters is not the absolute cost of production but the opportunity cost, which measures how much production of one good, is reduced to produce one more unit of the other good.
a country that makes the good it produuces
A nation will export goods for which it has a comparative advantage. By exporting goods, it has the comparative advantage because it means they have a lower opportunity cost for producing the good. A country can produce it well and can produce most likely a lot of it.
comparative advantage
comparative advantage