0
What else can I help you with?
An economy with no government regulation would be completely what?
An economy with no government regulation would be completely laissez-faire, operating solely on free market principles. In such a system, businesses and individuals would make decisions based entirely on supply and demand, with no oversight or intervention. This could lead to innovation and efficiency but may also result in significant inequalities, exploitation, and market failures. Overall, it would foster an environment of unrestrained competition and potential instability.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of government intervention in higher education?
Government intervention in higher education can enhance accessibility and affordability, leading to a more educated workforce and reduced income inequality. However, it may also result in bureaucratic inefficiencies, stifling innovation and competition among institutions. Additionally, excessive regulation could limit institutional autonomy and responsiveness to market demands. Balancing support with flexibility is crucial for maximizing the benefits of such intervention.
Pure market economies always what?
Pure market economies always rely on supply and demand to allocate resources without government intervention. In such systems, prices are determined by the interactions between consumers and producers, leading to efficient distribution of goods and services. However, pure market economies can also lead to inequalities and may not adequately address public goods or externalities. As a result, most economies incorporate some level of government regulation to balance these issues.
What is the result of a price floor?
If the price floor is above market equilibrium then companies are forced to sell at that price. This means the market's quantity supplied and quantity demanded will not equal each other, resulting in a surplus. If the price floor is lower than market equilibrium then the government imposed regulation is non-binding, resulting in no change to the market.
What are the areas of economy where government intervention is considered desirable?
It is possible according to some interpretations for a market economy to have government intervention in the economy. The key difference between market economies and planned economies lies not with the degree of government influence but whether that influence is used to coercively preclude private decision.[original research?] In a market economy, if the government wants more steel, it collects taxes and then buys the steel at market prices. In a planned economy, a government which wants more steel simply orders it to be produced and sets the price by decree. An economy where both central planning and market mechanisms of production and distribution are present is known as a mixed economy. Germany's social market economy was one of the better functioning mixed economies, as microeconomists note that it had relatively free prices compared to other more socialist countries like the United Kingdom for much of the later 20th century.[citation needed] The proper role for government in a market economy remains controversial. Most supporters of a market economy believe that government has a legitimate role in defining and enforcing the basic rules of the market. Different perspectives exist as to how strong a role the government should have in both guiding the economy and addressing the inequalities the market produces. For example, there is no universal agreement on issues such as protectionist tariffs, federal control of interest rates, and welfare programs. Milton Friedman, along with many microeconomists[Who?], believed that too much government intervention and regulation can result in hampering or stopping the transmission of information necessary to allow the market to operate, resulting in very serious government externalities that can lead to inflation, deflation, recessions, and economic depressions. Milton Friedman believes that the Great Depression was the result of a government created externalities and thus was responsible for the causes of the Great Depression
What are the advantages and disadvantages of government intervention in higher education?
Government intervention in higher education can enhance accessibility and affordability, leading to a more educated workforce and reduced income inequality. However, it may also result in bureaucratic inefficiencies, stifling innovation and competition among institutions. Additionally, excessive regulation could limit institutional autonomy and responsiveness to market demands. Balancing support with flexibility is crucial for maximizing the benefits of such intervention.
Pure market economies always what?
Pure market economies always rely on supply and demand to allocate resources without government intervention. In such systems, prices are determined by the interactions between consumers and producers, leading to efficient distribution of goods and services. However, pure market economies can also lead to inequalities and may not adequately address public goods or externalities. As a result, most economies incorporate some level of government regulation to balance these issues.
The construction of Hoover Dam was the result of what kind of government intervention in the economy?
Public Work Program
The construction of the Hoover Dam was the result of what kind of government intervention in the economy?
public works program
What construction of hoover dam was the result of what kind of government intervention in the economy?
Public Work Program
What is the result of a price floor?
If the price floor is above market equilibrium then companies are forced to sell at that price. This means the market's quantity supplied and quantity demanded will not equal each other, resulting in a surplus. If the price floor is lower than market equilibrium then the government imposed regulation is non-binding, resulting in no change to the market.
What are the areas of economy where government intervention is considered desirable?
It is possible according to some interpretations for a market economy to have government intervention in the economy. The key difference between market economies and planned economies lies not with the degree of government influence but whether that influence is used to coercively preclude private decision.[original research?] In a market economy, if the government wants more steel, it collects taxes and then buys the steel at market prices. In a planned economy, a government which wants more steel simply orders it to be produced and sets the price by decree. An economy where both central planning and market mechanisms of production and distribution are present is known as a mixed economy. Germany's social market economy was one of the better functioning mixed economies, as microeconomists note that it had relatively free prices compared to other more socialist countries like the United Kingdom for much of the later 20th century.[citation needed] The proper role for government in a market economy remains controversial. Most supporters of a market economy believe that government has a legitimate role in defining and enforcing the basic rules of the market. Different perspectives exist as to how strong a role the government should have in both guiding the economy and addressing the inequalities the market produces. For example, there is no universal agreement on issues such as protectionist tariffs, federal control of interest rates, and welfare programs. Milton Friedman, along with many microeconomists[Who?], believed that too much government intervention and regulation can result in hampering or stopping the transmission of information necessary to allow the market to operate, resulting in very serious government externalities that can lead to inflation, deflation, recessions, and economic depressions. Milton Friedman believes that the Great Depression was the result of a government created externalities and thus was responsible for the causes of the Great Depression
What is An economic system based on individuals looking out for their own and their families best interest?
An economic system based on individuals looking out for their own and their families' best interests is typically referred to as a capitalist or market economy. In this system, decisions regarding production, investment, and distribution are driven by individual choices and competition, with minimal government intervention. The idea is that individuals acting in their self-interest will lead to efficient resource allocation and economic growth. However, this can also result in inequalities and externalities that may require regulation or intervention to address.
What is the result of the government guiding the supply of money in the economy through regulation of banking interest rates?
Reduced inflation and unemployment rates
What happened to the economy as a result of the stock market crash?
The money from the government had dramatically decreased
Market-based economic system with limited government involvment?
A market-based economic system with limited government involvement, often referred to as a free market economy, relies on the forces of supply and demand to allocate resources efficiently. In this system, individuals and businesses make decisions regarding production, investment, and consumption with minimal regulatory constraints. The government's role is typically restricted to enforcing contracts, protecting property rights, and maintaining competition, while allowing the market to drive innovation and economic growth. This approach can lead to increased efficiency and consumer choice, although it may also result in income inequality and market failures without some government intervention.
What is the expected result of the government guiding the supply of money in the economy through regulation of banking interest rates?
Reduced inflation and unemployment rates
