Everyone according to his abilites, to everyone according to his work.
Supply and demand determines what will be produced.
A command economy is one that is run by a central authority which has control over every aspect of the economy. The Soviet Union prior to its demise in 1990 had a command economy. (North Korea still has one.) Everyone in the Soviet Union was employed by the state, everyone lived in state assigned housing, everything for sale in the stores was chosen by the state and ordered by the state, and so forth.
North Korea, Iran and Cuba
write short note on education aspect in Nigerian economy
There are many political flavors of that, but over all, it's called a "Command" economy. Examples can be nations that outright acknowledged this, such as the Soviet Union in the past, or China today. Or it can be nations that choose to keep the outward forms of freedom in name, but command all aspects of the economy all the same. Such as the United Kingdom or the United States. Between those two extremes - of utter honesty about the control and utter insistence that the obvious isn't taking place - are all the rest of the nations, all with more or less of a command economy, all with varying degrees of admitting this. There are special enclaves of non-command economies. More technically, the command is very light. Hong Kong had been a prime example. Various little nations scattered about the globe still retain a largely free market existence. These are handy for those in charge of the command economies to have a place to keep their funds.
Supply and demand determines what will be produced.
Supply and demand determines what will be produced.
A command economy is one that is run by a central authority which has control over every aspect of the economy. The Soviet Union prior to its demise in 1990 had a command economy. (North Korea still has one.) Everyone in the Soviet Union was employed by the state, everyone lived in state assigned housing, everything for sale in the stores was chosen by the state and ordered by the state, and so forth.
A command economy is one that is run by a central authority which has control over every aspect of the economy. The Soviet Union prior to its demise in 1990 had a command economy. (North Korea still has one.) Everyone in the Soviet Union was employed by the state, everyone lived in state assigned housing, everything for sale in the stores was chosen by the state and ordered by the state, and so forth.
North Korea, Iran and Cuba
A command economy is one that is run by a central authority which has control over every aspect of the economy. The Soviet Union prior to its demise in 1990 had a command economy. (North Korea still has one.) Everyone in the Soviet Union was employed by the state, everyone lived in state assigned housing, everything for sale in the stores was chosen by the state and ordered by the state, and so forth.
write short note on education aspect in Nigerian economy
Yes
Culture Economy Education
theory
sexual intercourse
There are many political flavors of that, but over all, it's called a "Command" economy. Examples can be nations that outright acknowledged this, such as the Soviet Union in the past, or China today. Or it can be nations that choose to keep the outward forms of freedom in name, but command all aspects of the economy all the same. Such as the United Kingdom or the United States. Between those two extremes - of utter honesty about the control and utter insistence that the obvious isn't taking place - are all the rest of the nations, all with more or less of a command economy, all with varying degrees of admitting this. There are special enclaves of non-command economies. More technically, the command is very light. Hong Kong had been a prime example. Various little nations scattered about the globe still retain a largely free market existence. These are handy for those in charge of the command economies to have a place to keep their funds.