= "What is relation between law and justice?" =
There can be no economic justice anywhere in the world as long as there are humans involved in the economy.
As of January 2011, Eric Holder is the Attorney General of the United States.
This is homework and you need to answer this prompt. Your teacher is looking for your critical thinking skills and how well you understood the lesson. Not our thinking.
Laws don't always ensure justice. Without proper interpretation and implementation law is lame.
A just distribution in society is one that is fair, equitable, and in accordance with moral, legal, and cultural norms. It considers factors such as individual merit, needs, and contributions to society in determining the allocation of resources. It aims to reduce inequalities and provide opportunities for all members of society to thrive.
Julian Lamont has written: 'Distributive justice' -- subject(s): Distributive justice
distributive justice
Carl Knight has written: 'Responsibility and distributive justice' -- subject(s): Philosophy, Responsibility, Distributive justice, Political science
A process view of distributive justice focuses on the fairness of procedures and decision-making processes in distributing resources or opportunities, while an end state view focuses on the fairness of the ultimate outcome or distribution of resources or opportunities. The process view emphasizes fair procedures regardless of the outcome, whereas the end state view prioritizes fair outcomes regardless of the process.
Rawls's distributive justice emphasizes the fair distribution of social and economic goods, such as income and wealth, to ensure equal opportunities for all individuals. Corrective justice, on the other hand, focuses on rectifying injustices or inequalities that may have arisen within society through compensation or redistribution. Both concepts are central to Rawls's theory of justice as fairness, which seeks to create a more just and equitable society.
Distributive justice in organizational behavior is a type of organizational justice that focuses on a person's perception that they have received fair compensation for their work (i.e. pay, recognition, better assignments, etc.)
Distributive justice focuses on the perceived fairness of outcomes, while procedural justice focuses on the fairness of the process by which decisions are made. In designing pay systems, countries that value distributive justice may prioritize equal pay for equal work, while those that emphasize procedural justice may focus on transparency and employee involvement in pay decisions. Socio-cultural norms and values will also influence how these principles are applied in different countries.
Manfred Hassebrauck has written: 'Emotionale Konsequenzen distributiver Ungerechtigkeit' -- subject(s): Distributive justice, Equality, Psychological aspects, Psychological aspects of Distributive justice, Psychological aspects of Equality, Psychological aspects of Social justice, Social justice
Aristotle identified four divisions of justice: distributive justice, which concerns the fair distribution of resources and rewards; commutative justice, which focuses on fair exchanges between individuals; legal justice, which involves obeying the laws of the land; and corrective justice, which deals with rectifying wrongs and restoring balance after injustices have occurred.
W. King Mott has written: 'The third way' -- subject(s): Catholic Church, Distributive justice, Political and social views, Religious aspects, Religious aspects of Distributive justice
Procedural justice is the process leading up to an outcome (use of organizational resources). Distributive justice is how organization resources are allocated. Here is an example for getting a bonus at work Procedural Justice If you do A, B, and C you will get a bonus. Distributive Justice You did A, B, and C, here is your bonus Distributive Injustice You did A, B, and C, but you're not getting a bonus.