increases
The grammatical subject is "relationship.""According to the law of demand" is a sentence modifier and should have a comma after it.The main verb is "exists," and its grammatical subject is "relationship." "Negative" is an adjective that modifies "relationship."The rest of the sentence, from "between" to the end, is a prepositional phrase with two objects--"price" and "quantity"--and several modifiers. The whole prepositional phrase is adverbial and modifies "exists."
He was a rich merchent''make exclamatory sentence''?I hardly know where to begin! (That, by the way, was an exclamatory sentence. I was exclaiming about all your grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors.) Let's start with spelling. The word is spelled merchant, not merchent. That was the easy part. Next, let's deal with punctuation. Your intention was to quote a sentence that said something about someone. You wanted to quote a statement saying that someone was a rich merchant. Then you wanted to ask if the statement was an exclamatory sentence. When you quote something, the words you quote get enclosed in quotation marks. Oops! You got it completely turned around. This is the way your sentence should have been punctuated: "He was a rich merchant," make exclamatory sentence? We're not finished yet. "He was a rich merchant," is a complete sentence in itself. But adding 'make exclamatory sentence' does not turn the entire passage into a complete sentence. You wanted to ask whether the sentence "He was a rich merchant," was an exclamatory sentence. The words 'make exclamatory sentence' do not accomplish this. There is no interrogative aspect to what you have written. You haven't asked a question. (Furthermore, the verb 'make' is not a very accurate choice of words.) Here's what you really wanted to ask: Is "He was a rich merchant," an exclamatory sentence? Simple, huh? So let's deal with that issue now. The answer to your question is, 'Maybe it is, and maybe it isn't.' "He was a rich merchant," looks like a simple declaratory sentence to me. It is a complete thought. It states a fact. There doesn't seem to be anything unusual about it. Is there anything unusual about the fact that he was a rich merchant? Would someone be surprised to learn that he was a rich merchant? Is it shocking to anyone that he was a rich merchant? Would someone exclaim, with wide-eyed amazement, that he was a rich merchant? Or is this just a plain, ordinary, every-day, ho-hum statement? What turns a declarative statement into an exclamatory statement is not the structure of the sentence. It is the context in which the statement is made. Is the context 'ho-hum' or is it shocking? A 'ho-hum' statement gets nothing more than a 'ho-hum' period. A shocking statement, a statement that is exclaimed, deserves (indeed, requires) an exclamation mark. I have carried on with this, at great length, because what you wrote could have been easy to read, but wasn't. It only takes a little effort to write well, and it's worth the effort. Next time, I hope you'll devote just a little more effort to writing clearly.
Yes. It's not a complete sentence. You must say what was prepared. But that is correct phrasing. Paperwork was prepared for this transaction. I was prepared for his resignation. Dinner was prepared by the children. Was the package prepared for shipping? The report was not prepared on time.
A topic sentence essentially presents the main idea. An outline sentence, on the other hand, gives the summary or plan.
Use bust in a sentence
I can give you several sentences.She demanded that he return her notebook.Billy demanded candy, and his mother refused.I didn't like it when you demanded that I wait on you.
The township demanded justice.I am the mayor of this township.
The quantity supplied the house for forty years.
The first part of the sentence, "winning the race", is a gerund phrase, and "winning" is the gerund. "Winning the race demanded speed and endurance" is an entire sentence, because it contains a subject (the gerund phrase) and a verb (demanded).
The grammatical subject is "relationship.""According to the law of demand" is a sentence modifier and should have a comma after it.The main verb is "exists," and its grammatical subject is "relationship." "Negative" is an adjective that modifies "relationship."The rest of the sentence, from "between" to the end, is a prepositional phrase with two objects--"price" and "quantity"--and several modifiers. The whole prepositional phrase is adverbial and modifies "exists."
Example sentence - After suffering a huge financial loss, reorganization was demanded by the company board.
The ransom that the pirates demanded were like the war INDEMNITIES and tribute money demanded in treaties of peace by other countries.
There is not one, my young apprentice. I see you have much to learn from my lessons
The mugger demanded the victim's wallet, violently assaulting him in the process.
"The armadillo is a poor swimmer." is a complete sentence
It is a complete sentence.
He has demanded a raise in wages, but I put a quietus on that request.