GDP can be an unreliable indicator of the standard of living because it does not account for income distribution, meaning it may mask disparities between rich and poor within a country. Additionally, GDP does not consider non-market activities, such as household labor and volunteer work, which contribute to societal well-being. It also overlooks factors like environmental quality and leisure time, which are essential for a high quality of life. Consequently, a high GDP can coexist with low living standards for certain segments of the population.
Standard of living of the people will increasethe country will developoutput of the country will increaseprices of goods might decrease
Standardit might be considered: a.) if you have nothing to do that week, b.) prudent c.) technically exhaustive d.) standardPRUDENT MAKES SENSE!
A pollunut is a fictional term and does not have a recognized definition in standard language or scientific terminology. It might be a typographical error or a combination of "pollutant" and "nut," but without context, its meaning is unclear. If you meant something specific, please provide more details for clarification.
GDP might not accurately reflect a country's economic health in situations where income inequality is high, as it can mask disparities in wealth distribution. Additionally, GDP does not account for informal economic activities or the value of unpaid labor, such as caregiving. Environmental degradation and social well-being are also overlooked, meaning a country could have high GDP growth while its citizens experience declining quality of life. Lastly, GDP does not differentiate between productive and destructive economic activities, such as spending on disaster recovery.
By buying fairtrade products you ensure that the person whom the product came from was paid a fair amount, and that they were not abused or forced to work in horrid conditions like those of sweat shops. It also ensures that they were not treated unfairly, or paid tiny wages. If you by standard products, there is a chance that they might have come from or been made by people working in sweatshops. This means that the person working really hard to make your product might have been paid a tiny wage to work 7 days a week. Wages can sometimes be less than £4 for 12 hours a day, 7 days a week!
The evidence might be unreliable because technology and other knowledge has advanced since that time, and their evidence might have been biased.
slow, might be unreliable
unreliable
unreliable
Standard of living of the people will increasethe country will developoutput of the country will increaseprices of goods might decrease
i don't know tell me the answer
The dashboard indicator light might have a loose connection. The dashboard indicator light might have a corroded or loose ground wire.
I think so. Yes, but it could be unreliable at times because anyone could answer. And you might not get an answer at all.
The first thing you would do is state what 'this' source is.
To make the battery % indicator show up " just alongside and to the left of the standard battery indicator " just go to Settings > General > Usage " and toggle the Battery Percentage setting to On.
Walmart and Target might be your choice.
Welfare is a system for nonworking and working citizens whose income might be inadequate to provide a sufficient amount of funds for a basic standard of living. It is a provisional or continuous system to reduce proverty and homelessness. Any citizen who makes below a country"s standard of comfortable living could need welfare