answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Economics

Phil Knight's leadership is transactional or transformational?

The style Phil Knight used as CEO of Nike would be considered Transformational, because transactional is more of a directive approach, and he didn't direct his company as much as other high-powered CEO's.


What is one British pound worth in US Dollars?

well my friend, the conversion to one British pound in US dollars is of course a piece of poo. i hope my answer helped my friend feel free to email me at sinep@gmail.com yours sincerely Phil macrack


How much is the value of 1994 100 Baisa to Phil peso?

As of my last knowledge update in October 2023, the conversion rate for Omani Baisa to Philippine Pesos varies, but 100 Baisa is approximately equal to 0.1 Omani Rial, which is around 13 to 15 Philippine Pesos, depending on current exchange rates. For the most accurate and up-to-date conversion, it's best to check a reliable financial news source or currency converter.


When was the Glass-Steagall Act repealed?

The bill that ultimately repealed the Act was introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa) in 1999. The bills were passed by a Republican majority, basically following party lines by a 54-44 vote in the Senate and by a bi-partisan 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives. After passing both the Senate and House the bill was moved to a conference committee to work out the differences between the Senate and House versions. The final bill resolving the differences was passed in the Senate 90-8 (one not voting) and in the House: 362-57 (15 not voting). The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999.


Is the Federal Reserve unconstitutional?

Answer OK - let's keep it simple you say the "Federal Reserve acts as a regulatory agency". But there is no governmental control according to the SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No governmental control= UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Lewis v. United States, 680 F.2d 1239 (1982) the court ruled that the Federal Reserve Banks are "independent, privately owned and locally controlled corporations", and there is not sufficient "federal government control over 'detailed physical performance' and 'day to day operation'" of the Federal Reserve Bank for it to be considered a federal agency: Congressional Attempts to Control the Fed (quotes courtesy of site linked below - quotes not under copyright) 1937 Rep. Charles G. Binderup of Nebraska 1952 Rep. Wright Patman of Texas ( House Banking Chairman) "In fact there has never been an independent audit of either the twelve banks of the Federal Reserve Board that has been filed with the Congress ... For 40 years the system, while freely using the money of the government, has not made a proper accounting." Patman RE: Federal Open Market Committee "one of the most secret societies. These twelve men decide what happens in the economy ... In making decisions they check with no one -- not the President, not the Congress, not the people." Patman also said: "In the United States we have, in effect, two governments ... We have the duly constituted Government ... Then we have an independent, uncontrolled and uncoordinated government in the Federal Reserve System, operating the money powers which are reserved to Congress by the Constitution." 1971 Rep. John R. Rarick of Louisiana introduced H.R. 351: "To vest in the Government of the United States the full, absolute, complete, and unconditional ownership of the twelve Federal Reserve Banks." He said: "The Federal Reserve is not an agency of government. It is a private banking monopoly." He was later defeated for re-election. 1980's, Rep. Phil Crane of Illinois called for the repeal of the Federal Reserve Act. In 1980 congress passed the Monetary Control Act,it gave the Federal Reserve control of all banking institutions. The majority of the post below was plagiarized from two websites - see links. Answer You know, whenever I hear what I think are just crazy questions like this...one of my first thoughts is: Just for a second...say it was even remotely possible that all those very involved, dedicated people, on all sides of the discussion, knew it was so...why would they keep it hidden...but even more importantly....what do you think... would it take even 5 minutes to correct it and just pass a law, or whatever is needed, allowing it? Maybe less. Then of course...I think your probably so confused that your not asking about anything even related to what you think...I suspect you want to challenge the Constitutionality of an income tax...(which by the way is addressed in the 16th amendment). Not the Federal Reseve..which is defined below and is really just a method for orderly banking and I can't imagine being a Constitutional issue.