Rich people are rich because they have effectual control of significant amounts of the factors of production and employ those in lucrative ways, or because they are effectually privileged to extract payments from others. For example, some have talents that are valuable in the labour market, others have valuable skills (human capital), some own (directly or through companies) land, mines, fisheries (land) or valuable building, plant, and equipment (capital), and others have valuable reputations that make advertisers and movie-makers want them to appear in movies, advertisements, and sporting competitions (social capital). For further example, others are able to pay themselves huge salaries and bonuses out of the funds of companies that belong to other people, or use government authority to exact bribes and embezzle public funds and other assets.
Poor people are poor because they lack valuable labour, land, capital, human capital, or social capital, or because they have disabilities that overwhelm their advantages, or because they squander their advantages, or because they are denied the opportunity to put their advantages to lucrative use (often because of lack of public infrastructure, because of defective legal and economic institutions, or because they are oppressed), or because they are exploited by monopsonists in the markets for their factors of production, or because they are oppressed, or because they are robbed, or because war destroys their assets and the markets for their assets.
For poor countries to become wealthy the most important thing is not to have a war fought in their territory. Second most-important is not to have a corrupt government that steals public funds and public assets and extorts bribes. Other important things are to have efficient and effective enforcement of contracts with clear rules as to who owns what, adequate transport infrastructure, a large proportion of the people able to read and write, and an minimum of barriers to economic activity (such as regulations, fees, internal tariffs, restrictive licences, and burden of compliance with bureaucratic rules). Free foreign trade and free foreign investment help, too.
Midddle class
An antonym for the word 'wealthy' would be 'poor'.
Income taxes are usually progressive, so would effect the wealthy the most, while sales taxes would have a greater effect on the poor.
Thomas Edison was actually a wealthy family
Poor farmers
Increase tourism places, like china has the great wall...
The wealthy nations gain market expansion, if they are wise enough to see the potential. Therefore they should invest in the economic advancement of the poor nations
Greece has both wealthy people and poor people. But many are middle class.
Wealthy nations may invest in poor ones to promote economic development, create new markets for their goods and services, improve political stability, and address global challenges such as poverty and climate change. These investments can also benefit the wealthy nation by opening up new opportunities for trade and investment.
the colonies were not divided into a few rich people and a large mass of poor people as in most of Europe. in the colonies, there was no royalty and no titled nobility. the difference between wealthy and poor people was less important in colonial society . A poor person could become wealthy by using knowledge, skills, and opportunities.in many cases, a man who was not part of the wealthy class could be elected to government position.
wealthy people should help poor people.
Anthony gave up his wealthy life style to become a poor friar.
No, they mostly all stayed poor
its sorta 70 30 with more richpeople than poor people
yes wealthy people ate beef and poor people had a main diet of fish but both ate bread and drank wine
I'm guessing both but id go with wealthy although poor people at my school go for every sport.
Midddle class