Sharecroppers who failed to earn enough from their crops to cover expenses often fell into a cycle of debt. They were typically required to borrow money from landowners or local merchants to pay for seeds, tools, and living expenses, which could lead to further financial obligation. This situation frequently resulted in them being trapped in a system of exploitation, as they could lose their share of the harvest or even their rights to farm the land. Consequently, many sharecroppers remained impoverished and dependent on the landowners.
Tenant farmers were also known as share croppers. They did all the work, raised the crop, in exchange for the right to sell part of the crop. Share cropping is now infamous because of the grinding poverty that most of those people lived in.
When you farm land belonging to someone else and share the resulting crop with the owner instead of paying rent.
The type of farmer who works land owned by another and pays rent in cash or crops is known as a tenant farmer. Tenant farmers typically do not own the land they farm but instead lease it from landowners. They often have agreements that specify the terms of rent payments, which can be made in various forms, including a share of the crops produced. This arrangement allows the landowner to earn income from their property while providing the tenant with the opportunity to cultivate and profit from the land.
Sharecroppers who made money in a growing season had the opportunity to improve their financial situation by saving or reinvesting their earnings into better equipment, seeds, or land for future crops. Successful seasons could also allow them to negotiate better terms with landowners or potentially buy their own land. Additionally, surplus income might enable them to support their families more effectively or invest in education for their children, fostering upward mobility. However, these opportunities were often limited by systemic economic and social challenges.
is share cropping legal in the US
Former slaves that had no land or food to provide for themselves or their family. They started working for the whits and planted crops. They only had enough food to feed themselves and there families. The whites go majority of the crops
because they were dogs
share croppers
Share croppers were at risk of non profit but slavery was for free so slave owners pick slaves rather than share croppers and the cotton the slaves pick were more of value so having someone for free
They could not afford to buy land, but all they knew was farming. A large number of freed slaves in the South became share croppers, as they could not find other work.
Sharecroppers were farmers, often African Americans in the Southern United States after the Civil War, who worked on land owned by others in exchange for a share of the crops they produced. They were often in a cycle of poverty and debt due to unfair contracts and exploitative practices by landowners.
Yes, sharecroppers typically paid rent in the form of a share of the crops they produced. Instead of paying cash rent, they would give a portion of their harvest to the landowner, which could be as much as half or more of their total yield. This system often kept sharecroppers in a cycle of debt and poverty, as they had to purchase supplies and food on credit from the landowners or local merchants.
African Americans share croppers
Basicly slaves they had to work for a white landowner and had to barrow and pay for tools and after farming crops the landowner would sale them and depending on their contract theAfrican Americansor poor whiteswould get so much money. The share croppers couldn't sell their left over supplies.
Most remained in debt to the land owners and were unable to move away.
The share croppers are the freed slaves that "rented" a white farmers land in exchange for an agreement of a percentage of the sharecroppers yearly crops. They "share" "crops", thus the name sharecroppers. By the 1900's most of these sharecroppers had land of their own. The agreed percentages varied from 5% to 95% it all depended on the person or "landlord" so-to-speak and the richness of the soil therefore determining the crops that could be grown. I'm always trying to answer the newest questions, and hope this is a good enough answer that got here fast enough! Good luck on all future endeavors.