Want this question answered?
it is easier for economists to measure "cost" than "opportunity cost"(because people's tastes are different and changeable)
You can actually get the magazine The Economist on a great discount at Amazon. The magazine is at 64% off discount currently and Amazon is a reputable seller of magazines.
Trade-offs and opportunity costs are alike in one main way. Perhaps you would make a trade-off in order to enjoy something that you wanted, and you may lose the opportunity to use this item if you do not make the trade-off.
Although not an actual cost, opportunity cost to an investor is the income he could have earned if he had invested in the next best alternative to the one he actually made.
No. Marginal cost is the added cost of producing one more of something. This type of cost is real and concrete; it actually has monetary value. Opportunity cost is more theoretical. It measures the amount of money / products that could have been made in places other than the job you are currently in. This is very similar to implicit costs.
it is easier for economists to measure "cost" than "opportunity cost"(because people's tastes are different and changeable)
You can actually get the magazine The Economist on a great discount at Amazon. The magazine is at 64% off discount currently and Amazon is a reputable seller of magazines.
A complete misunderstanding of what those two words actually mean is the only thing I can think of.
An opportunity cost is a theoretical calculation of how much money you might have made if you had done something other than what you actually did. I do not know of any taxes on theoretical calculations.
At a certain point in time, I was actually considering going out with him!
In a trade-off you give up something for something else. If you exchange some item with someone for something of equal value, you have made a trade-off.in opportunity cost you are forced to make an alternate choice that you did not intend to make. Here you are giving up something of better value for something of lesser value. Usually there is remorse here. You actually are not as happy as you would have been if you had the opportunity to make the original choice.If you go to the store to purchase an item and for some reason you left that item in the store and bring something else home. This could happen because the price s too high, the quality was not as advertised, or you just did not see yourself buying this item. You opportunity cost is the item you left behind in the store.
By considering the kinds of news we have access to
Bear actually is indiginous to much of the woods of the northern hemisphere actually and is known to mall actually your actual face off when given the actual opportunity.
Trade-offs and opportunity costs are alike in one main way. Perhaps you would make a trade-off in order to enjoy something that you wanted, and you may lose the opportunity to use this item if you do not make the trade-off.
empirical
They actually have great vision, considering they have 100 tiny blue eyes.
Considering that they dated, I would say yes.