Because opportunity cost doesn't show up as an accounting expense.
yes, depreciation is an implicit cost. but this implicit cost is added to total costs in calculating accounting profits.
Opportunity Cost
the opportunity cost or value of the best by a business
An implicit cost for a firm refers to the opportunity cost of using resources that could have been employed elsewhere. For example, if an entrepreneur invests their own capital into a business instead of earning interest on it in a savings account, the foregone interest represents an implicit cost. Similarly, if the owner dedicates their time to the business rather than working for a salary elsewhere, that lost income is also considered an implicit cost.
First of all, we need to understand what is explicit cost and implicit cost. Explicit cost mean real expenses, while implicit cost mean opportunity cost. In accounting profit, we only minus explicit cost, while in economic profit we minus explicit cost and implicit cost. therefore accounting profit is higher than economic profit.
yes, depreciation is an implicit cost. but this implicit cost is added to total costs in calculating accounting profits.
Explicit cost and Implicit cost are the two dimensions of cost What role does cost play in financial decisions?
Opportunity Cost
the opportunity cost or value of the best by a business
There is almost an implicit assumption that tutors know about these things.
An implicit cost for a firm refers to the opportunity cost of using resources that could have been employed elsewhere. For example, if an entrepreneur invests their own capital into a business instead of earning interest on it in a savings account, the foregone interest represents an implicit cost. Similarly, if the owner dedicates their time to the business rather than working for a salary elsewhere, that lost income is also considered an implicit cost.
First of all, we need to understand what is explicit cost and implicit cost. Explicit cost mean real expenses, while implicit cost mean opportunity cost. In accounting profit, we only minus explicit cost, while in economic profit we minus explicit cost and implicit cost. therefore accounting profit is higher than economic profit.
it is easier for economists to measure "cost" than "opportunity cost"(because people's tastes are different and changeable)
Economists always include both implicit and explicit costs in the calculation of their profits while accountants only cater for explicit costs when calculating profits.So due to the inclusion of opportunity costs, which can be termed implicit costs, economists' profits will always be lower than accountants' profits.Hence an accountant may say they are making profits while it is different from an economist's view.
opportunity cost
According to the "Bible" for accounting terminology, Barron's Dictionary of Accounting Terms, 5th Edition, they are the same. In fact, when you look up implicit cost, it refers you to imputed cost. This is the definition of imputed cost: "A cost that is implied but not reflected in the financial reports of the firm: also called implicit cost. Imputed costs consist of opportunity costs of time and capital that the manage has invested in producing the given quantity of production and the opportunity costs of making a particular choice among the alternatives being considered."
Payment for leasing a building is generally considered an explicit cost, as it involves a direct monetary transaction that is clearly accounted for in the firm's financial statements. However, if the firm owns the building and could have earned rental income by leasing it out to another party, the opportunity cost of not renting it is an implicit cost. Thus, while leasing payments are explicit costs, the potential income from alternative uses of owned property represents an implicit cost.