Andrew Carnegie took a hard line on charity because he believed in the principle of the "Gospel of Wealth," which argued that the affluent have a moral obligation to distribute their wealth in ways that benefit society. He contended that indiscriminate giving could foster dependency rather than promote self-improvement. Instead, he advocated for strategic philanthropy that empowered individuals and communities, emphasizing education and infrastructure over direct financial aid. This approach aimed to encourage personal responsibility and create lasting societal change.
I need the answer fast!
In 2007, the New Republic Online reviewed a book, Andrew Carnegie, by David Nasaw. According to the review. . .>>"Carnegie . . .was one of the few rich Americans who could claim to be a self-made man. But, to his credit, he refused to do so, locating the source of his wealth -- indeed, of any millionaire's wealth -- in "the community," by which he meant that he had been in the right place at the right time: Pittsburgh in the 1870s, when the shift from iron to steel was about to take off. And as Nasaw convincingly shows, Carnegie also had a knack for insinuating himself with corporate mentors and turning them into dependable cronies.
they think really hard..
John D. Rockefeller focused on horizontal integration for business consolidation, primarily through the creation of the Standard Oil Trust, which aimed to control the oil industry by acquiring and merging with competitors. In contrast, Andrew Carnegie employed vertical integration, aiming to control every aspect of steel production, from raw materials to distribution. While Rockefeller's strategy centered on eliminating competition to establish monopolies, Carnegie's approach involved optimizing production processes and supply chains to increase efficiency and reduce costs. Both strategies were effective, but they represented fundamentally different philosophies of business growth.
"Going into detail would take hours, but, bottom line, you've got a problem."We use the idiom "bottom line" (coming from the bottom line of things like bills that tell us what we actually have to pay or do) to say, at the end of it all (in summary), what's going on or what's going to happen.
Essentially, Carnegie is decrying those who make a lifestyle out of receiving charity for no further purpose, and those who enable them to continue doing so. The "worthy" man is one who will use charity to rise above it, and the "unworthy" man is one who will take and continue to take, with no thought of personal improvement.
There are a number of 'Carnegie Hall's' and modifications. The links below will give you extensive information.
used to take care of the poor
I need the answer fast!
They are a charity.. They take in abandoned and abused animals and look after them
I need the answer fast!
I need the answer fast!
Take it to the dealer or garage as it is hard to get the air out of the line.
because johnson expressed bitterness to the confederates.
Mr. Cunningham had his pride and sense of dignity that prevented him from accepting charity.
Goodwill is one charity that will usually take your old car, be it running condition or not. Cars For Causes is another charity that will take your car; you can check out their website to see if they are in your area.
Don't do that! If you try to push a girl away she will take it the wrong way. But if she's hard to get, play along the best you can but don't go over the line. Girls are very tricky. Take it from me, I'm a girl ;D do you best and good luck!