Usually when we look at GDP, we want to use it as an approximation for one of two things: productivity, or wellbeing. To do so we need to make like comparisons between economies of different sizes. Thus, if we have two nations with GDP's of $1 trillion, but one country has 10 million people, while the other has 100 million, then the first country is actually much more productive, since it is producing the same value with fewer resources, and likely enjoys a much higher standard of living (at least some people do-we don't know about equity from this scenario). The first country produces, and can consume $100,000 in value per person, quite a lot, while the second produces just $10,000 per person, and can consume only that amount.
In market economies, firms developing new and better products are often able to earn larger than normal profits.
in market economies firm develping new and better products are often able to earn larger than normal profits.
Comparing countries economics based on their GDP per-capita is better because every country has a different population.
GDP per capita reflects the income of individuals, and can be used to compare countries whereas GDP reflects the total income in the economy and can't be used to compare economies with different populations. For example: If the GDP of country A is 100 and country B is 200, it appears that country B is better off. But if country A has a population of 50 and country B has a popultion of 200, then each citizen in country A has an income of 2 and each citizen of country B has an income of 1, so country A is actually better off.
Economic models are useful in understanding and predicting market and economic behavior because they provide a simplified representation of complex systems. By using data and assumptions, these models help economists analyze and forecast how changes in variables like supply, demand, and government policies can impact markets and economies. This allows for better decision-making and policy planning to address potential challenges and opportunities.
They have different functions and fulfil different requirements. It is not possible to compare them directly.
Firstly both play at two different positions , so how can you compare them.
In market economies, firms developing new and better products are often able to earn larger than normal profits.
In market economies, firms developing new and better products are often able to earn larger than normal profits.
In market economies, firms developing new and better products are often able to earn larger than normal profits.
in market economies firm develping new and better products are often able to earn larger than normal profits.
Online companies such as Find A Better Bank or Money Buddy offer a comparison tool which allows you to compare different bank accounts. You can compare the fees, interest rates and when interest is paid of the bank accounts.
A good strategy to compare broadband plans is to put the feature of two broadband bands side by side. The side with more features that are better can be considered better.
You can't compare apples and oranges. They play different positions.
It's impossible to compare the two. They're different types of games.
I think you cannot compare because they are two different things with very different tastes. In my opinion, tomato tastes better because cucumber has no flavour.
This is like trying to compare a car to a bicycle......there are in different catigories