financial gains made in an economic transaction
Since GDP is the total $ amount of financial transactions (buying and selling)... if you increase the number of transactions and/or the $ amount per transaction, GDP would increase. if the # of transactions in one year was 1,000,000,000 and the average $ amount per transaction was $1,000, GDP would be $1,000,000,000,000 or $1T. If the next year the # of transactions was 1,100,000,000 and the average $ amount per transaction was $1,000, GDP would be $1,100,000,000,000 or $1.1T or a 10% increase in GDP. I don't know how many transactions we had in the past year or how much the average $ amount was per transaction, but since GDP was about $14.5 trillion...it was a lot but not enough to grow GDP per capita to make people (buyers) and businesses confident enough to spend their cash or take on additional debt.
no. remember that GDP is a measure of the total market value of a country's output at a "given time period" .When making a Pure financial transaction no "current" production has taken place.The value of what is being exchanged was already counted as part of GDP at the time it was produced.Clear cases seen in buying stocks or Bonds,its simply swapping one assets for another.In short pure financial transactions are not included to prevent DOUBLE counting.
i think that it is consumption investment government and net exports
Because it was produced in Mexico; therefore such production is counted for Mexico and not for the United States.
financial gains made in an economic transaction
Since GDP is the total $ amount of financial transactions (buying and selling)... if you increase the number of transactions and/or the $ amount per transaction, GDP would increase. if the # of transactions in one year was 1,000,000,000 and the average $ amount per transaction was $1,000, GDP would be $1,000,000,000,000 or $1T. If the next year the # of transactions was 1,100,000,000 and the average $ amount per transaction was $1,000, GDP would be $1,100,000,000,000 or $1.1T or a 10% increase in GDP. I don't know how many transactions we had in the past year or how much the average $ amount was per transaction, but since GDP was about $14.5 trillion...it was a lot but not enough to grow GDP per capita to make people (buyers) and businesses confident enough to spend their cash or take on additional debt.
no. remember that GDP is a measure of the total market value of a country's output at a "given time period" .When making a Pure financial transaction no "current" production has taken place.The value of what is being exchanged was already counted as part of GDP at the time it was produced.Clear cases seen in buying stocks or Bonds,its simply swapping one assets for another.In short pure financial transactions are not included to prevent DOUBLE counting.
i think that it is consumption investment government and net exports
a TRANSACTION
transaction data
Well, GDP or Gross Domestic Product is the Financial Indicator of a country's financial health. Rising growth of GDP will mean USA will no more be dependent on financial package provided by Federal Reserve to tide over the precarious economic scenario and would facilitate in easing the acute unemployment rate plauging the country.
Financial institution is an institution that deals with financial transaction.
Adverse selection occurs before the financial transaction takes place
iii
Because it was produced in Mexico; therefore such production is counted for Mexico and not for the United States.
'Muamalat' is an Arabic word meaning financial transaction.