Perfect competition allows for fairer price structures than those that would likely be seen in a monopoly.
Without monopoly society would flatline, where economic growth would slow to a stop and socio-economics would die. This is because in order to have a positively functioning society one must promote growth. Competition must exist in society in order for growth to occur and be more effective. Monopoly is the process by which a firm competes in a market sector with other firms in a fight for control toward a puremonopoly.
A monopoly is the ultimate goal of an individual company or enterprise in a truly capitalistic society. However, capitalism also means free and fair market competition so laws have been enacted to prevent total monopoly of any particular industry but not of a particular process, item or service.
Encourage frims to research and develop new products that benefit society as a whole.
Total control, as there is no competition the monopoly vendor can ask any price they wish. That is why monopolies are bad for society and Governments have to intervene in the capitalistic market.
i don't think it's good enough especially in the developed country or society, beside the positive impact for rising the potency of the society, perfect competition also make the competition only available for whom had enough resources, not for all society. so this condition must have a mediator to make competition become fair enough for the society
Without monopoly society would flatline, where economic growth would slow to a stop and socio-economics would die. This is because in order to have a positively functioning society one must promote growth. Competition must exist in society in order for growth to occur and be more effective. Monopoly is the process by which a firm competes in a market sector with other firms in a fight for control toward a puremonopoly.
A monopoly is the ultimate goal of an individual company or enterprise in a truly capitalistic society. However, capitalism also means free and fair market competition so laws have been enacted to prevent total monopoly of any particular industry but not of a particular process, item or service.
Does not give the customer the right to choose, and without competition must pay the asking price of whatever the organization sets. The government makes it a point to break up monopolies, to increase competition which is better for society in general, as well as the economy.
He created monopoly
Believe it or not, for the past 6 years, Iraq have the PERFECT society.
Competition would be the driving force of exclusion
In "The Giver," the society values sameness to ensure stability and control. By limiting individuality and differences, the community believes it can prevent conflict, jealousy, and competition among its members. This way, everyone is expected to conform to the same standards and rules, creating a uniform and predictable society.
Rockefeller believed that, "Competition is a sin." Yet he was also a philanthropist. Competition is good for a capitalistic society like the US. Competitors lower prices which draws the consumer to them. This doesn't sound like something a philanthropist, someone who loves all people and wants to help them, would say.
Encourage frims to research and develop new products that benefit society as a whole.
Encourage frims to research and develop new products that benefit society as a whole.
Total control, as there is no competition the monopoly vendor can ask any price they wish. That is why monopolies are bad for society and Governments have to intervene in the capitalistic market.
no........?