answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer
  • De jure means "by law" and de facto means "as a matter of fact." So De jure segregation is segregation required by law (such as a school being segregated because there is a law requiring it), whereas de facto segregation is more just by chance (such as settlement patterns in a city leading to segregated schools).
  • De facto segregation is segregation by fact or circumstance. Very often this is not a conscious choice. A good example is found in neighborhoods, frequently there is a white neighborhood or a black neighborhood, this concentration can lead to schools that are predominately one race. (Xe facto is latin for by fact.)
  • "De facto" means the person who is serving in that position, or as "in fact"; whereas "de jure" means the person who is legally entitled to perform that function, or "by law," and has the right to perform a function or hold an office. It is important to note that hundreds of years ago, women did not have certain rights, and their husbands would perform the functions for them, although there are other latin terms for that.
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Changing de jure segregation simply involves writing or rewriting laws. To change de facto segregation, you have to change the minds and hearts of people and this takes forever.

You also have to change housing, employment and economic conditions that divide people by social class. De facto segregation affects not just race but entire socioeconomic groups.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why is de facto segregation harder to change than de jure segregation?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Economics

Will turkey become a european union member later this year?

Turkey is applying for membership but is not currently a member of the European Union. There are five main reasons given for the European Union's failure to accept the bid.1) Turkish Failure to Recognize the Armenian Genocide:Many states in the European Union have recognized the Armenian Genocide as a fundamental denial of human rights against the Armenians. The Turkish Government currently espouses the view that while there may have been some indiscretions, it does not rise to the level of genocide. However, this view runs contrary to nearly all established scholarship outside of Turkey. Additionally, Turkey compels many world governments to not to accept the term "genocide" using its critical location and foreign policy as weapons against taking this view.2) Turkish Invasion and Occupation of North Cyprus: In 1974, the Turkish army launched an amphibious assault in Cyprus to protect Turkish Cypriots from an increasingly pro-Greek Cypriot majority. In 1974, the UN established a ceasefire line which has divided Cyprus into northern and southern halfs. To this day there has been no formal peace treaty. Turkey has also moved 200,000 Turkish citizens to the north of Cyprus in violation of the Fourth Geneva Convention. (Considering that the population of Cyprus is only 1.1 million, this is a huge population transfer.) Being in a state of war against an EU member state, which Cyprus is, and occupying the de jure territory of another country are both violations of the terms of accession to the European Union3) Turkish Repression of the Kurdish Minority: Kurds represent between 15-25% of the overall Turkish citizenry. They have a unique language, culture, and society from ethnic Turks. Many aspects of Kurdish culture are actively restricted. Their language was illegal for many decades as was the right to name their children with Kurdish names. Some Kurdish cities have been renamed in order to "Turk-ify" them. Some Kurds have risen in rebellion against the Turkish government, but far many more have attempted to have a peaceful discussion with the Turkish government. However, the Turkish government has assassinated numerous Kurdish politicians attempting to make peace and improve the situation. This maltreatment of a significant minority is appalling to European Union member states.4) Turkey's Poor Human Rights Record: There are limits on the Freedoms of Speech and the Press in Turkey. The Justice System is relatively corrupt and the Prison System is badly maintained. Additionally, there are extra-national executions (where a person is sent to another country to be executed since capital punishment is illegal in Turkey) and relatively common applications of prisoner torture. There are military barracks near most Turkish cities in order to prevent protests and riots. Turkey is a liberal democracy in comparison to most Middle Eastern countries, but not in comparison to the much greater transparency and freedoms in most of the remaining European Union countries.5) Turkey's Developing Economy: Turkey is a developing economy whereas most of the European Union has a developed economy. Since the European Union is first and foremost an economic union and then a superstate structure, having an economy that operates along different principles from most European economies makes accession more difficult.There are two additional reasons cited by Turks and their sympathizers as to why their bid has not been accepted.1) Economic Competition: Although Turkey is a developing country, it has a population larger than every current European Union member other than Germany. Turkey's economy is growing at a very high rate and Turkish infrastructure is completely evolving. Additionally, due to European Union internal migration laws, many Turks would likely migrate to other European countries without VISA issues. This would lead to competition for employment opportunities between citizens of other European Union countries and Turkish migrants. The fear of the growing Turkish economy and the migration of Turks to other countries makes many Europeans wary of Turkish accession.2) Islam: There is currently no member in European Union which is a majority-Muslim country. Given Europe's frigid reception of Muslim immigrants, many Turks say that the primary reason that they have not been allowed to become a part of the European Union is that their religion and culture have been labelled as "different" and "non-European".


Related questions

What kind of segregation is it when segregation is not allowed but people do it anyways?

De jure segregation is created by laws; de facto segregation is created by social conditions.Today, de facto segregation is enforced by socioeconomic status, which affects educational and employment opportunities.


Which is the correct translation of segregation de facto?

Segregation de facto is when one faction separates themselves from another out of choice rather than by segregation de jure, which is when the separation is enforced by rule of law.


Which best describes de jure segregation?

De jure segregation is a separation that is enforced by rule of law, such as pre-civil rights laws that mandated that persons of color sit in separate areas or use differing facilities. The landmark Supreme Court ruling, Brown v Board of Education highlighted the importance of the distinction between defacto segregation, which is segregation by personal preference, and de jure segregation.


Which is an example of de jure segregation?

De Jure Segregation is racial separation which is forced by specific laws. De facto segregation is generally caused by socioeconomic conditions, not by statute.


What was Segregation In The North?

For the most part, it was not de jure (i.e, a matter of law) but de facto (a matter of fact).


What is the name for school segregation that results from racially divided neighborhoods rather than state laws?

When segregation is ordered by law, it is called de jure segregation; when created by social or environmental circumstances it is called de facto segregation. De facto means "existing in fact," without being mandated by law.


What was true segregation in the north?

For the most part, it was not de jure (i.e, a matter of law) but de facto (a matter of fact).


What does de jure and de facto politica power mean?

jure power = legislation ;facto power=justice


What does de jure mean in English?

De jure translates from Latin to English as, "to law." As an adverb, de jure refers to conditions created by enacted law, as opposed to "de facto," conditions created by social or economic circumstances, but not by law.For example, the US Supreme Court declared de jure racial segregation [enacted laws] unconstitutional, but many inner-city schools suffer de facto segregation because the school district serves an area populated by lower income African-American families.


What is the different between de jure and de facto segregation?

De jure segregation refers to segregation that is enforced by laws or government policies, while de facto segregation refers to segregation that occurs through social and economic factors without official government involvement.


What was true about neighborhoods under de facto segregation in northern cities?

There was a lack of public services.


When did De Jure Segregation begin?

It began when the Supreme Court first approved of de jure segregation inPlessyv.Ferguson(1896)